Child Care and Early Education Research Connections

Skip to main content

Evidence-based Kindergarten Entry Inventory for the Commonwealth: A journey of ongoing improvement [Executive summary]

The focus of Phase 1 was to examine the construct validity of the PA KEI. Evidence of construct validity refers to scientific evidence that the items within an assessment operate in a manner that is aligned with the dimensions that the PA KEI purports to measure. The Phase 1 research questions are as follows: 1. What are the characteristics of the PA KEI indicators? 2. Does the PA KEI measure five distinct dimensions of children's competency at kindergarten entry? If not, what are the evidence-supported dimensions? 3. Within each of the identified dimension structures, do the PA KEI indicators function as expected? 4. Do the dimensions of the PA KEI operate consistently across relevant subgroups of children (i.e., gender, race, children with special needs, and dual language learners)? Given the results of Phase 1, OCDEL decided to pursue a concurrent validity study during Phase 2 (Path A). However, had Phase 1 not found scientific support for measuring dimensions of children's competencies, the focus of Phase 2 (Path B) would have been on additional measurement development, including potential revisions to indicators, development of new indicators, revision of rating categories, and/or identification of new constructs to measure. Instead, the focus of Phase 2 was to assess the concurrent validity of the evidence-based dimensions derived from Phase 1 using other independent, validated measures of children's knowledge and skills at kindergarten entry. A concurrent validity study examines the relationships between the domains of a measure under investigation and existing validated measures of similar and dissimilar domains. Phase 2 also included an examination of the extent to which children's PA KEI scores (derived from teachers' ratings of children in their classroom) are directly attributable to the child rather than to between-classroom sources of variability, such as teacher characteristics (e.g., experience) or the context within which children are rated (e.g., large and small classrooms may place different levels of burden on teachers, which may impact PA KEI ratings). The Phase 2 research questions are as follows: 5. Do the evidence-based PA KEI dimensions validated by the construct validity study correlate with other validated kindergarten assessments of similar constructs? 6. To what extent do the scores reflect information about individual children? (author abstract)
Resource Type:
Executive Summary

Related resources include summaries, versions, measures (instruments), or other resources in which the current document plays a part. Research products funded by the Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation are related to their project records.

- You May Also Like

These resources share similarities with the current selection. They are found by comparing the topic, author, and resource type of the currently selected resource to the rest of the library’s publications.

Implementation evaluation of the STREAMin3 curriculum model [Executive summary]

Executive Summaryview

Year 4 report: Seattle Preschool Program evaluation [Executive summary]

Executive Summaryview

Utah High-Quality School Readiness Expansion (HQSR-E) program evaluation: 2018-2019 findings [Executive summary]

Executive Summaryview
Release: 'v1.2.0' | Built: 2022-01-05 13:45:43 EST