The relationship between the Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale and its revised form and child outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Resource Type: Literature Review
Author(s): Brunsek, Ashley; Perlman, Michal; Falenchuk, Olesya; McMullen, Evelyn; Fletcher, Brooke A.; Shah, Prakesh S.;
Date Issued: 06 June, 2017
Description: The Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale (ECERS) and its revised version (ECERS-R) were designed as global measures of quality that assess structural and process aspects of Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) programs. Despite frequent use of the ECERS/ECERS-R in research and applied settings, associations between it and child outcomes have not been systematically reviewed. The objective of this research was to evaluate the association between the ECERS/ECERS-R and children's wellbeing. Searches of Medline, PsycINFO, ERIC, websites of large datasets and reference sections of all retrieved articles were completed up to July 3, 2015. Eligible studies provided a statistical link between the ECERS/ECERS-R and child outcomes for preschool-aged children in ECEC programs. Of the 823 studies selected for full review, 73 were included in the systematic review and 16 were meta-analyzed. The combined sample across all eligible studies consisted of 33, 318 preschool-aged children. Qualitative systematic review results revealed that ECERS/ECERS-R total scores were more generally associated with positive outcomes than subscales or factors. Seventeen separate meta-analyses were conducted to assess the strength of association between the ECERS/ECERS-R and measures that assessed children's language, math and social-emotional outcomes. Meta-analyses revealed a small number of weak effects (in the expected direction) between the ECERS/ECERS-R total score and children's language and positive behavior outcomes. The Language-Reasoning subscale was weakly related to a language outcome. The enormous heterogeneity in how studies operationalized the ECERS/ECERS-R, the outcomes measured and statistics reported limited our ability to meta-analyze many studies. Greater consistency in study methodology is needed in this area of research. Despite these methodological challenges, the ECERS/ECERS-R does appear to capture aspects of quality that are important for children's wellbeing; however, the strength of association is weak. (author abstract)
show entire record ↓
Funder(s): Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Journal Title: PLoS One
Volume Number: 12
Issue Number: 6
Page Range: 1-29
Note: Article number e0178512
Topics: Research & Evaluation Methods > Measures

Child Care & Early Education Quality

International Child Care & Early Education
ISSN: 1932-6203 Online
Peer Reviewed: yes
hide record ↑

More Like This

what is this? These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of a measure of staff/child interaction quality (the Classroom Assessment Scoring System) in early childhood education and care settings and child outcomes Literature Review
Child-staff ratios in early childhood education and care settings and child outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis Literature Review
Education of staff in preschool aged classrooms in child care centers and child outcomes: A meta-analysis and systematic review Literature Review
Using the Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale-Revised in high stakes contexts: Does evidence warrant the practice? Reports & Papers
The association between preschool classroom quality and children's social-emotional problems Reports & Papers

Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections' Terms of Use.