The relationship between the Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale and its revised form and child outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Resource Type: Literature Review
Author(s): Brunsek, Ashley; Perlman, Michal; Falenchuk, Olesya; McMullen, Evelyn; Fletcher, Brooke A.; Shah, Prakesh S.;
Date Issued: 06 June, 2017
Description: The Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale (ECERS) and its revised version (ECERS-R) were designed as global measures of quality that assess structural and process aspects of Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) programs. Despite frequent use of the ECERS/ECERS-R in research and applied settings, associations between it and child outcomes have not been systematically reviewed. The objective of this research was to evaluate the association between the ECERS/ECERS-R and children's wellbeing. Searches of Medline, PsycINFO, ERIC, websites of large datasets and reference sections of all retrieved articles were completed up to July 3, 2015. Eligible studies provided a statistical link between the ECERS/ECERS-R and child outcomes for preschool-aged children in ECEC programs. Of the 823 studies selected for full review, 73 were included in the systematic review and 16 were meta-analyzed. The combined sample across all eligible studies consisted of 33, 318 preschool-aged children. Qualitative systematic review results revealed that ECERS/ECERS-R total scores were more generally associated with positive outcomes than subscales or factors. Seventeen separate meta-analyses were conducted to assess the strength of association between the ECERS/ECERS-R and measures that assessed children's language, math and social-emotional outcomes. Meta-analyses revealed a small number of weak effects (in the expected direction) between the ECERS/ECERS-R total score and children's language and positive behavior outcomes. The Language-Reasoning subscale was weakly related to a language outcome. The enormous heterogeneity in how studies operationalized the ECERS/ECERS-R, the outcomes measured and statistics reported limited our ability to meta-analyze many studies. Greater consistency in study methodology is needed in this area of research. Despite these methodological challenges, the ECERS/ECERS-R does appear to capture aspects of quality that are important for children's wellbeing; however, the strength of association is weak. (author abstract)
show entire record ↓
Funder(s): Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Journal Title: PLoS One
Volume Number: 12
Issue Number: 6
Page Range: 1-29
Note: Article number e0178512
Topics: Research & Evaluation Methods > Measures

Child Care & Early Education Quality

International Child Care & Early Education
ISSN: 1932-6203 Online
Peer Reviewed: yes
hide record ↑




Our Search Engine Recommends...

what is this? These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of a measure of staff/child interaction quality (the Classroom Assessment Scoring System) in early childhood education and care settings and child outcomes Literature Review
Child-staff ratios in early childhood education and care settings and child outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis Literature Review
Education of staff in preschool aged classrooms in child care centers and child outcomes: A meta-analysis and systematic review Literature Review
Using the Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale-Revised in high stakes contexts: Does evidence warrant the practice? Reports & Papers
The association between preschool classroom quality and children's social-emotional problems Reports & Papers

Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections' Terms of Use.