Variable Search Results

Your query returned 326646 variables. Use the search box below to revise your search .

 
 
 
 
[1]   2   3   4     >    >
Name
Label/Question

id number

Taken from: The 500 Family Study [1998-2000: United States] - Experience Sampling Method (ESM) Data.

family id number

Taken from: The 500 Family Study [1998-2000: United States] - Experience Sampling Method (ESM) Data.

individual is male

Taken from: The 500 Family Study [1998-2000: United States] - Experience Sampling Method (ESM) Data.

24 - total income in last calendar year

Taken from: The 500 Family Study [1998-2000: United States] - Experience Sampling Method (ESM) Data.

individual is in a family with a kindergarten aged child

Taken from: The 500 Family Study [1998-2000: United States] - Experience Sampling Method (ESM) Data.

93 - health status

Taken from: The 500 Family Study [1998-2000: United States] - Experience Sampling Method (ESM) Data.

age of father

Taken from: The 500 Family Study [1998-2000: United States] - Experience Sampling Method (ESM) Data.

age of mother

Taken from: The 500 Family Study [1998-2000: United States] - Experience Sampling Method (ESM) Data.

abstracted from mom/dad age and records

Taken from: The 500 Family Study [1998-2000: United States] - Experience Sampling Method (ESM) Data.

family with a single parent

Taken from: The 500 Family Study [1998-2000: United States] - Experience Sampling Method (ESM) Data.

number of children

Taken from: The 500 Family Study [1998-2000: United States] - Experience Sampling Method (ESM) Data.

number of parents

Taken from: The 500 Family Study [1998-2000: United States] - Experience Sampling Method (ESM) Data.

community identifier for family

Taken from: The 500 Family Study [1998-2000: United States] - Experience Sampling Method (ESM) Data.

imputed depression score

Taken from: The 500 Family Study [1998-2000: United States] - Experience Sampling Method (ESM) Data.

time4=time 3 on a scale of 0 to 24

Taken from: The 500 Family Study [1998-2000: United States] - Experience Sampling Method (ESM) Data.

day 1 waking nmol/l mean cortisol level (including outlier cases) transformed in

Taken from: The 500 Family Study [1998-2000: United States] - Experience Sampling Method (ESM) Data.

time4=time 3 on a scale of 0 to 24

Taken from: The 500 Family Study [1998-2000: United States] - Experience Sampling Method (ESM) Data.

day 2 waking nmol/l mean cortisol level (including outlier cases) transformed in

Taken from: The 500 Family Study [1998-2000: United States] - Experience Sampling Method (ESM) Data.

time4=time 3 on a scale of 0 to 24

Taken from: The 500 Family Study [1998-2000: United States] - Experience Sampling Method (ESM) Data.

day 1 bedtime nmol/l mean cortisol level (including outlier cases) transformed i

Taken from: The 500 Family Study [1998-2000: United States] - Experience Sampling Method (ESM) Data.

time4=time 3 on a scale of 0 to 24

Taken from: The 500 Family Study [1998-2000: United States] - Experience Sampling Method (ESM) Data.

day 2 bedtime nmol/l mean cortisol level (including outlier cases) transformed i

Taken from: The 500 Family Study [1998-2000: United States] - Experience Sampling Method (ESM) Data.

day 1 slope, ln transform of day 1 cortisol values: restricted to individuals wi

Taken from: The 500 Family Study [1998-2000: United States] - Experience Sampling Method (ESM) Data.

day 1 r2 value of day 1 line

Taken from: The 500 Family Study [1998-2000: United States] - Experience Sampling Method (ESM) Data.

day 2 slope, ln transform of day 2 cortisol values: restricted to individuals wi

Taken from: The 500 Family Study [1998-2000: United States] - Experience Sampling Method (ESM) Data.

[1]   2   3   4     >    >

Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate