Search Results

RC Produced by Research Connections

* Peer Reviewed Journal

Current Search: topic:quality-rating-systems;   
Current Filters: Author:Paulsell, Diane [remove]; New in two years [remove];

45 results found.
[1]   2     >    >
Select Citation
Result Resource Type

Better beginnings: The Seeds to Success Modified Field Test: Impact evaluation findings
Boller, Kimberley, July, 2010
Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.

Findings from an impact evaluation of Seeds to Success, a quality rating and improvement system developed as part of the Early Learning Initiative in White Center and East Yakima, Washington

Fact Sheets & Briefs


get fulltext

Better beginnings: The Seeds to Success Modified Field Test: Implementation lessons
Del Grosso, Patricia, July, 2010
Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.

Lessons from the implementation evaluation of Seeds to Success, a quality rating and improvement system developed as part of the Early Learning Initiative in White Center and East Yakima, Washington

Fact Sheets & Briefs


get fulltext

The Seeds to Success Modified Field Test: Findings from the impact and implementation studies [Executive summary]
Boller, Kimberley, 28 June, 2010
Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.

A summary of an implementation and impact evaluation of Seeds to Success, a quality rating and improvement system developed as part of the Early Learning Initiative in White Center and East Yakima, Washington, based on pre- and post-treatment program observations and staff surveys and interviews in 14 randomly assigned child care centers and 52 randomly assigned family child care providers

Executive Summary


get fulltext

The Seeds to Success Modified Field Test: Findings from the impact and implementation studies
Boller, Kimberley, 28 June, 2010
Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.

An implementation and impact evaluation of Seeds to Success, a quality rating and improvement system developed as part of the Early Learning Initiative in White Center and East Yakima, Washington, based on pre- and post-treatment program observations and staff surveys and interviews in 14 randomly assigned child care centers and 52 randomly assigned family child care providers

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Partnerships for quality: Improving infant-toddler child care for low-income families
United States. Child Care Bureau, 2002
Washington, DC: Zero to Three.

A study of collaborations to increase access to high-quality child care for low-income families

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Partnerships for quality: Improving infant-toddler child care for low-income families [Executive summary]
United States. Child Care Bureau, 2002
Washington, DC: Zero to Three.

A summary of a study of the impact of collaborative community initiatives to improve access to quality infant-toddler child care for low-income families

Executive Summary


get fulltext

Supporting quality in home-based child care: A compendium of 23 initiatives
United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, March 05, 2010
Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.

A compendium of details and descriptions of 23 quality initiatives targeted at home-based child care

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Supporting quality in home-based child care: Final brief
United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, March 31, 2010
Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.

Highlights of findings from an examination of the prevalence and quality of home-based child care, with a focus on programs and initiatives to improve the quality and outcomes of children who attend

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Family-sensitive caregiving: A key component of quality in early care and education arrangements
Bromer, Juliet, 2011
In M. Zaslow, I. Martinez-Beck, K. Tout, & T. Halle (Eds.), Quality measurement in early childhood settings (pp. 161-190). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes

A presentation of a model for the assessment of early childhood education and care providers' attitudes towards, knowledge about, and practices with families with young children

Reports & Papers


A compilation of initiatives to support home-based child care
United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, March 31, 2010
Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.

A compilation of profiles of 96 initiatives that target and support home-based child care

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Supporting quality in home-based child care: Initiative design and evaluation options
United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, March 30, 2010
Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.

A discussion of strategies for the implementation and evaluation of programs and initiatives that support home-based child care

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Building a community-wide early learning system: East Yakima at baseline
Del Grosso, Patricia, 05 May, 2008
Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.

Baseline findings from a multi-year implementation evaluation, one of four components in an overall evaluation, of the East Yakima Early Learning Initiative, part of a 10-year strategy to improve children's school readiness in Washington State, that examined the East Yakima community, the availability and quality of child care services there, the East Yakima Early Learning Initiative planning process, and the community's goals and expectations for East Yakima Early Learning Initiative implementation

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Building a community-wide early learning system: White Center at baseline
Paulsell, Diane, 05 May, 2008
Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.

Baseline findings from a multi-year implementation evaluation, one of four components in an overall evaluation, of the White Center Early Learning Initiative (WCELI), part of a 10-year strategy to improve children's school readiness in Washington State, that examined the White Center community, the availability and quality of child care services there, the WCELI planning process, and the community's goals and expectations for WCELI implementation

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Quality care for low-income infants and toddlers: A study of community strategies
Paulsell, Diane, 2002
Zero to Three, 22(4), 44-49

A summary of research on how Early Head Start-child care partnerships help low-income families overcome barriers to child care access.

Other


Building a community-wide early learning system: White Center at baseline [Executive summary]
Paulsell, Diane, 05 May, 2008
Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.

A summary of baseline findings from a multi-year implementation evaluation, one of four components in an overall evaluation, of the White Center Early Learning Initiative (WCELI), part of a 10-year strategy to improve children's school readiness in Washington State, that examined the White Center community, the availability and quality of child care services there, the WCELI planning process, and the community's goals and expectations for WCELI implementation

Executive Summary


get fulltext

A review of the literature on home-based child care: Implications for future directions: Final
United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, January 15, 2010
Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.

An exploration of the use of family and informal child care initiatives to improve children's development and families' outcomes, based on a review of over 135 research articles on past and present family child care interventions

Literature Review


get fulltext

Quality child care for infants and toddlers: Case studies of three community strategies
Paulsell, Diane, 2003
Washington, DC: Zero to Three.

A study of child care quality and it impact on infants and toddlers presenting a set of in-depth case studies of three types of collaborative infant-toddler child care initiatives located in four diverse communities, with findings collected during intensive three-day sight visits to the case study communities

Reports & Papers


Quality child care for infants and toddlers: Case studies of three community strategies: Executive summary
Paulsell, Diane, 2003
Washington, DC: Zero to Three.

A study of child care quality and it impact on infants and toddlers presenting a set of in-depth case studies of three types of collaborative infant-toddler child care initiatives located in four diverse communities, with findings collected during intensive three-day sight visits to the case study communities

Executive Summary


get fulltext

Quality child care for infants and toddlers from families with low incomes: Lessons learned from three communities
Paulsell, Diane, 2003
Zero to Three, 23(4), 4-10

An examination of community-level strategies to improve child care quality and affordability, based on case studies of three communities with Head Start programs in El Paso County in Colorado, Buncombe County in North Carolina, and the program in Kansas City, Kansas and Sedalia, Missouri

Other


The Enhanced Home Visiting Pilot Project: How Early Head Start programs are reaching out to kith and kin caregivers: Final interim report [Executive Summary]
Paulsell, Diane, 2006
Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.

A summary of a preliminary descriptive evaluation of the Enhanced Home Visiting Pilot Project, examining participant characteristics and program design as they affect the extension of home visitation services to relatives and non-relatives caring for infants and toddlers enrolled in home-based Early Head Start programs

Executive Summary


get fulltext

Kansas and Missouri Early Head Start programs: Kansas City, Kansas, and Sedalia, Missouri
Paulsell, Diane, 2003
Zero to Three, 23(4), 17-26

An overview of two Early Head Start programs, Project EAGLE, in Kansas City, Kansas and the Children’s Therapy Center, in Sedalia, Missouri, by reviewing the programs’ partnerships with community child care providers, implementation successes and challenges of these partnerships, and lessons learned

Reports & Papers


Pathways to quality and full implementation in Early Head Start programs [Executive summary]
United States. Administration for Children and Families, 2002
Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

A summary of a report characterizing the development of Early Head Start programs over the first four years of the program's existence

Executive Summary


get fulltext

Early Head Start Research and Evaluation Project
United States. Administration for Children and Families,
Education Resources Information Center

This project involves both a cross-site national study and local longitudinal studies of low-income families with young children in Early Head Start sites in 17 communities in the United States. The project was funded in two waves: Birth to Three (1996-2001) and Pre-Kindergarten Follow-Up (2001-2004). The five major components of the project are: an implementation study, an impact evaluation, local research studies, policy studies, and efforts toward continuous program improvement. The implementation study assessed the level and quality of implementation of EHS at each site, as well as variations across sites, with regard to five program areas: child development and health care; family partnerships; community involvement and partnerships; staff development; and program management. Results include a profile of each of the 17 research programs, their services and expected outcomes. The information gathered was critical for the development of the impact evaluation analyses and the identification of pathways to full implementation. The impact evaluation followed a random assignment, longitudinal design to examine how child, parent and family outcomes were influenced by EHS programs, as well as by variations in program approaches and community contexts, program implementation and services, and the characteristics of children and their families. The third component involves 16 local research projects conducted by 15 university-based researchers who partnered with Early Head Start research programs. Designed to investigate the unique outcomes and program functions of each Early Head Start program, these longitudinal studies continue through the second phase of the project, Pre-Kindergarten Follow-up (2001-2004). The policy studies component focuses on issues related to welfare reform, health and disabilities, child-care and fatherhood. The component of continuous program improvement consists of reports and presentations disseminating new information that can help all Early Head Start programs to increase their ability to meet the needs of families.

Major Research Projects


Home Visiting Evidence of Effectiveness review: Executive summary
United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, November 2010
Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.

A summary of a review of research on the effectiveness of home visiting programs for pregnant women or families with children from birth to age 5

Executive Summary


get fulltext

Better beginnings: The state of early learning and kindergarten readiness in East Yakima and White Center
Paulsell, Diane, August, 2008
Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research.

An overview of children, families, school readiness, and early learning services and quality in East Yakima and White Center, Washington, prior to the start of the East Yakima and White Center Early Learning Initiatives, parts of a 10-year strategy to improve children's school readiness in Washington State

Fact Sheets & Briefs


get fulltext

Select Citation
[1]   2     >    >

Search Feedback


 



Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate