Browse the Collection

RC Produced by Research Connections

* Peer Reviewed Journal

Current Filters: Pub Year:2007 [remove]; State:SOUTH CAROLINA [remove];

10 results found.
[1]  
Select Citation
Result Resource Type

An effectiveness-based evaluation of five state pre-kindergarten programs using regression-discontinuity
Wong, Vivian C., June 2007
New Brunswick, NJ: National Institute for Early Education Research.

A study of the impact of state prekindergarten programs in Michigan, New Jersey, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and West Virginia on children's vocabulary, math, and print awareness skills by comparing children who had completed a year of prekindergarten with nonparticipants who had missed the enrollment age cut-off and were about to start prekindergarten

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Effects of five state prekindergarten programs on early learning
Barnett, W. Steven, October 2007
New Brunswick, NJ: National Institute for Early Education Research.

A study of the impact of state prekindergarten programs in Michigan, New Jersey, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and West Virginia on children's vocabulary, math, and print awareness skills by comparing children who had completed a year of prekindergarten with nonparticipants who had missed the enrollment age cut-off and were about to start prekindergarten

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Interim evaluation report on the first year implementation of the Child Development Education Pilot Program (CDEPP)
South Carolina Education Oversight Committee, February, 2007
Columbia: South Carolina Education Oversight Committee.

An inventory of available prekindergarten programs for four-year-olds in South Carolina, and an inquiry into the resources needed to implement a full-day, full-year prekindergarten program for all four-year-old children who qualify for free- or reduced-price lunch

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

July 2007: Interim evaluation on the first year implementation of the Child Development Education Pilot Program (CDEPP)
South Carolina Education Oversight Committee, July 24, 2007
Columbia: South Carolina Education Oversight Committee.

Updated findings from an evaluation of the pilot year of the Child Development Education Pilot Program (CDEPP), South Carolina's early childhood education program to improve the school readiness of students in poverty, during the 2006-2007 program year, including information of program expenditures and services provided

Reports & Papers


Oral health promotion, prevention, & treatment strategies for Head Start families: Early findings from the Oral Health Initiative evaluation: Vol. II. Site profiles
United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, September 05, 2007
Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.

Interim findings from a two-year implementation evaluation of the Head Start Oral Health Initiative, which provided grants to Head Start programs to design and implement oral health promotion strategies, based on 1) interviews with program directors, 2) a web-based record-keeping system for grantees, and 3) site visits. This volume is based on data from the first source

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Parents and the high price of child care: 2007 update
National Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Agencies, 2007
Arlington, VA: National Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Agencies.

A study of the prices of center-based and family child care for infants, toddlers, and preschool-age children, based on a national survey of state child care resource and referral networks and local child care resource and referral agencies

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Practices and policies: Market rate surveys in states, territories, and tribes
Weber, Roberta B. (Bobbie), May 2007
Corvallis, OR: Oregon Child Care Research Partnership

Findings from a study examining current child care market rate survey methods, practices, and policies in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, territories, and tribes, including descriptions of challenges faced by jurisdictions in conducting surveys, and methods of providing study data

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Preliminary report of the South Carolina Task Force on Early Childhood Quality Standards
South Carolina. Task Force on Early Childhood Quality Standards, January 09, 2007
Columbia, SC: South Carolina First Steps to School Readiness.

Preliminary findings from a study of key components of quality early childhood programs, and recommendations for the adoption of program quality standards in South Carolina

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

The state of preschool 2007: State preschool yearbook
Barnett, W. Steven, 2007
New Brunswick, NJ: National Institute for Early Education Research.

An annual review of access, quality, and resources in state-funded preschool programs for children ages three and four, in all 50 states and the District of Columbia, during the 2006-2007 program year, based on a survey of administrators of state-funded preschool programs

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Update to the interim report on the first year implementation of the Child Development Education Pilot Program (CDEPP)
South Carolina Education Oversight Committee, July, 2007
Columbia: South Carolina Education Oversight Committee.

Highlights of updated findings from an evaluation of the pilot year of the Child Development Education Pilot Program (CDEPP), South Carolina's early childhood education program to improve the school readiness of students in poverty, during the 2006-2007 program year, including information of program expenditures and services provided

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Select Citation
[1]  

Search Feedback


 



Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate