Browse the Collection

RC Produced by Research Connections

* Peer Reviewed Journal

Current Filters: Publisher:University of Washington. Human Services Policy Center [remove]; Full Text:no [remove];

8 results found.
[1]  
Select Citation
Result Resource Type

Communications strategies for advocates of early childhood education: A focus group report from Full Circle Associates
Full Circle Associates, Fall 1998
In Effective language for discussing early childhood education and policy (pp 32-45). Washington, DC: Benton Foundation.

Results from two focus groups in which participants' reactions to a series of metaphors, frameworks, and labels for early education for children ages birth to six were recorded, including comparisons of responses of African American and white participants

Other


Early childhood education and the framing wars
Bales, Susan N., Fall 1998
In Effective language for discussing early childhood education and policy (pp 3-7). Washington, DC: Benton Foundation.

An introductory essay to a collection of articles discussing how parents and other adults can begin to frame child care issues in the terms of child development and early education, and as community issues that require community solutions

Other


Effective language for discussing early childhood education and policy
Benton Foundation, Fall 1998
Washington, DC: Benton Foundation.

A framework for the discussion of child care issues for child care and early education advocates, with a focus on the community issues and solutions

Other


Fact sheet: Percent of all non-parental child care hours by type of child care
Evans, Daniel J., Winter 2006
Seattle: University of Washington, Human Services Policy Center.

A discussion of the child care arrangements of children under 6 years, and the proportion of all non-parental care hours spent with either care centers, paid care from non-relatives, or family, friend, and neighbor care, based on results from the National Household Education Survey

Fact Sheets & Briefs


Potential improvements to Ohio’s Step Up to Quality program: Quality-based costs to providers, families, and funding agencies [Executive summary]
Brandon, Richard N., January 26, 2009
Seattle, WA: University of Washington, Human Services Policy Center.

A summary of an evaluation of the Quality Achievement Awards (QAA) in offsetting provider costs of meeting high quality child care standards, and an analysis of the costs of providing high quality services to participants in the Step Up to Quality (SUTQ) program, Ohio’s quality rating information system (QRIS)

Executive Summary


Public attitudes about early childhood care and education
Brandon, Richard N., Fall 1998
In Effective language for discussing early childhood education and policy (pp 21-31). Washington, DC: Benton Foundation.

A summary of public opinion survey results on child care policies, funding, quality, affordability, women in the labor force, and family values

Other


Supply, demand and accountability: Effective strategies to enhance the quality of early learning experiences through workforce improvement [Executive summary]
Brandon, Richard N., 2006
Seattle: University of Washington, Human Services Policy Center.

A summary of a discussion of strategies to be used for improving the quality of teaching and caregiving by early care and education staff, both nationally and for Washington State

Executive Summary


Why early ed benefits all of us
Lakoff, George, Fall 1998
In Effective language for discussing early childhood education and policy (pp 8-20). Washington, DC: Benton Foundation.

A discussion of metaphors, phraseology and components of rhetorical advocacy that could serve as methods for framing public discussions of early childhood education in order to achieve specific socio-political aims, written by scholars in the field of cognitive linguistics

Other


Select Citation
[1]  

Search Feedback


 



Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate