Browse the Collection

Produced by Research Connections

Peer Reviewed Journal

Current Filters: Publisher:United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation [remove];

167 results found.

Select Citation

Result

Resource Type

			2012 report: Migrant and Seasonal Head Start Supplement to the National Agricultural Worker Survey United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, March, 2012 (OPRE Report No. 2012-13). Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. Findings on the characteristics of families with children under 6 years old from the National Agricultural Worker Survey (NAWS), a national random sample survey of crop farmworkers, and findings on families' child care experiences from the NAWS Migrant and Seasonal Head Start Supplement, which is administered to NAWS respondents with children under the age of 6	Reports & Papers
			ACF/OPRE report: Data tables for FACES 2006 Head Start children go to kindergarten report United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, December 2010 Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. Data tables from a profile of the development, families, and home and school environments of kindergarten children who had entered Head Start in the fall of 2006, based on data from the Head Start Family and Child Experiences Survey 2006 (FACES 2006)	Other
			ACF/OPRE report: Data tables for FACES 2006 A second year in Head Start report United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, December 2010 Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. Data tables from a profile of the development, families, and home environments of children participating in their second year of Head Start who had entered the program at age 3 in the fall of 2006, based on spring 2008 data from the Head Start Family and Child Experiences Survey 2006 (FACES 2006)	Other
			ACF-OPRE report: Data tables for FACES 2006 A year in Head Start report United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, October 2010 Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. Data tables from a profile of the characteristics of Head Start children and families and their home and Head Start classroom environments from fall 2006 through spring 2007, including children's cognitive, physical, and socioemotional development, and Head Start classroom curricula and activities, based on data collected from a sample of 60 Head Start programs, 135 centers, 410 classrooms, 365 teachers, and 3,315 children and their parents	Other
			ACF/OPRE report: Head Start children go to kindergarten United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, December 2010 Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. A profile of the development, families, and home and school environments of kindergarten children who had entered Head Start in the fall of 2006, based on data from the Head Start Family and Child Experiences Survey 2006 (FACES 2006)	Reports & Papers
			ACF-OPRE report: A second year in Head Start: Characteristics and outcomes of children who entered the program at age three United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, December 2010 Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. A profile of the development, families, and home environments of children participating in their second year of Head Start who had entered the program at age 3 in the fall of 2006, based on spring 2008 data from the Head Start Family and Child Experiences Survey 2006 (FACES 2006)	Reports & Papers
			ACF-OPRE report: A year in Head Start: Children, families and programs United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, October, 2010 Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. A profile of the characteristics of Head Start children and families and their home and Head Start classroom environments from fall 2006 through spring 2007, including children's cognitive, physical, and socioemotional development, and Head Start classroom curricula and activities, based on data collected from a sample of 60 Head Start programs, 135 centers, 410 classrooms, 365 teachers, and 3,315 children and their parents	Reports & Papers
			Assessing the evidence of effectiveness of home visiting program models implemented in tribal communities: Final report United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, February 04, 2011 Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. A review of research on the effectiveness of home visiting programs for pregnant women or families with children from birth to age 5 in tribal communities or with samples that included substantial proportions of American Indian and Alaska Native participants	Literature Review
			Associations between provider training and education and other quality indicators in low-income children's primary care arrangements at 24 months of age Halle, Tamara, June 2009 (Publication No. 2009-18, OPRE Research Brief No. 2). Washington, DC: United States. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. A comparison of quality indicators in home- and center-based child care settings serving two-year-old low income children, and of the relationship of quality indicators in those settings to provider training and education, based on an analysis of data from the nationally representative Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Birth Cohort	Reports & Papers
			Associations between provider training and education and other quality indicators in low-income children's primary care arrangements at 24 months of age [Executive summary] Halle, Tamara, May 2009 (Publication No. 2009-18, OPRE Research Brief No. 2). Washington, DC: United States. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation A summary of a comparison of quality indicators in home- and center-based child care settings serving two-year-old low income children, and of the relationship of quality indicators in those settings to provider training and education, based on an analysis of data from the nationally representative Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Birth Cohort	Executive Summary
			Beginning Head Start: Children, families and programs in fall 2006: FACES 2006 baseline report Tarullo, Louisa B., December 2008 Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. A profile of the characteristics of newly enrolled Head Start children and families and their home and Head Start classroom environments in fall 2006, including children's cognitive, physical, and socioemotional development, and Head Start classroom curricula and activities, based on data collected from a sample of 60 Head Start programs, 135 centers, 410 classrooms, 365 teachers, and 3,315 children and their parents	Reports & Papers
			Best practices for conducting program observations as part of quality rating and improvement systems United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, June, 2011 (Research-to-Policy, Research-to-Practice Brief OPRE 2011-11b). Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. A discussion of considerations for the use of program observation as part of quality rating and improvement systems, including issues related to measurement selection, planning and conducting observations, and scoring and reporting	Fact Sheets & Briefs
			Building futures: The Head Start Impact Study: Interim report United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, 2003 Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. A report describing the purpose and progress of the Head Start Impact Study	Reports & Papers
			Building futures: The Head Start Impact Study: Interim report [Executive summary] United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, 2003 Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. A summary of the Head Start Impact Study progress report, a longitudinal study evaluating the impact of the Head Start intervention on children's developmental outcomes from the time of their enrollment in Head Start until their first grade year	Executive Summary
			Building futures: The Head Start impact study: Research design plan Puma, Michael, 2001 Washington, DC: Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. A report describing the sampling, data collection, and analytical techniques to be used in the Head Start impact evaluation.	Other
			The CCDF policies database book of tables: Key cross-state variations in CCDF policies as of October 1, 2009 Minton, Sarah, August, 2011 (OPRE Report 2011-37). Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation A comparison of aspects of Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) policies among the the 50 states, District of Columbia, and territories, including: (1) eligibility requirements for families and children; (2) application, redetermination, terms of authorization, and waiting lists; (3) family payments; (4) policies for providers, including reimbursement rates; and (5) administration and quality development	Other
			The CCDF policies database book of tables: Key cross-state variations in CCDF policies as of October 1, 2011 United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, October, 2012 (OPRE Report 2012-51). Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. A comparison of aspects of Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF)-related policies among the 50 states, District of Columbia, and territories, including: eligibility requirements for families and children; application, redetermination, terms of authorization, and waiting lists; family payments; and policies for providers, including reimbursement rates	Other
			Child care for welfare participants in rural areas United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, 2000 (Rural Welfare Issue Brief). Washington, DC: Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. A brief on the child care arrangements of the rural population.	Fact Sheets & Briefs
			The Child Care Quality Rating System (QRS) Assessment: Child care quality rating and improvement systems: Approaches to integrating programs for young children in two states United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, August, 2011 (OPRE Report 2011-28). Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. An examination of the role, and how to assess the role, that state child care quality rating and improvement systems can play in early childhood care and education system integration and development, based on document reviews, administrator interviews, and two-day site visits in Indiana and Pennsylvania	Reports & Papers
			The Child Care Quality Rating System (QRS) Assessment: Child care quality rating and improvement systems: Approaches to integrating programs for young children in two states [Executive summary] United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, August, 2011 (OPRE Report 2011-28). Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. A summary of an examination of the role, and how to assess the role, that state child care quality rating and improvement systems can play in early childhood care and education system integration and development, based on document reviews, administrator interviews, and two-day site visits in Indiana and Pennsylvania	Executive Summary
			The Child Care Quality Rating System (QRS) Assessment: Colorado Qualistar: QRS profile United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, April 2010 Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. A profile of Colorado Qualistar, the state's quality rating and improvement system for early childhood education and care programs, including information on rating guidelines, quality indicators, staff qualifications, and family engagement	Other
			The Child Care Quality Rating System (QRS) Assessment: Compendium of quality rating systems and evaluations United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, April, 2010 Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. A compendium of information on quality rating systems of child care and early education programs, including a proposal of an analytic framework for the assessment and evaluation of quality rating systems and profiles of such systems in 26 states	Reports & Papers
			The Child Care Quality Rating System (QRS) Assessment: Compendium of quality rating systems and evaluations [Executive summary] United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, April 2010 Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. A summary of a compendium of information on quality rating systems of child care and early education programs, including a proposal of an analytic framework for the assessment and evaluation of quality rating systems and profiles of such systems in 26 states	Executive Summary
			The Child Care Quality Rating System (QRS) Assessment: Defining and measuring quality: An in-depth study of five child care quality rating and improvement systems United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, August, 2011 (OPRE Report 2011-29). Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. An examination of aspects of child care quality rating and improvement systems related to definitions and measures of quality, including variation in definitions and measures, processes to measure each component and determine the overall level of quality, and availability of data on quality ratings, based on in-depth case studies in Miami-Dade County, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Pennsylvania, and Tennessee	Reports & Papers
			The Child Care Quality Rating System (QRS) Assessment: Defining and measuring quality: An in-depth study of five child care quality rating and improvement systems [Executive summary] United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, August, 2011 (OPRE Report 2011-29). Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. A summary of an examination of aspects of child care quality rating and improvement systems related to definitions and measures of quality, including variation in definitions and measures, processes to measure each component and determine the overall level of quality, and availability of data on quality ratings, based on in-depth case studies in Miami-Dade County, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Pennsylvania, and Tennessee	Executive Summary

Select Citation

Results 1 - 25

[1] 2 3 4

Browse the Collection

Search Feedback