Browse the Collection

RC Produced by Research Connections

* Peer Reviewed Journal

Current Filters: State:ILLINOIS [remove];

10 results found.
[1]  
Select Citation
Result Resource Type

Age 21 cost-benefit analysis of the Title I Chicago child-parent centers
Reynolds, Arthur J., 2002
(Discussion Paper No. 1245-02). University of Wisconsin--Madison, Institute for Research on Poverty.

A cost benefit analysis of the federally funded Chicago Child-Parent Center program using data from the Chicago Longitudinal Study from a cohort of children born in 1980.

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

*

Age 21 cost-benefit analysis of the Title I Chicago Child-Parent Centers
Reynolds, Arthur J., 2002
Educational Evaluation & Policy Analysis, 24(4), 267-303

A cost benefit analysis of the federally funded Chicago Child-Parent Center program using data from the Chicago Longitudinal Study from a cohort of children born in 1980

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

*

Alterable predictors of child well-being in the Chicago Longitudinal Study
Reynolds, Arthur J., 2004
Children and Youth Services Review, 26(1), 1-14

An overview of the major findings from the Chicago Longitudinal Study, including summaries of child well-being indicators and estimated effects of participation in preschool programs

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

*

Early Start: A literacy-rich prekindergarten program for children academically at risk
McCormick, Christine E., 1992
Journal of Early Intervention, 16(1), 79-86

A description Early Start, a center-based prekindergarten literacy program for at-risk children in Illinois, and an assessment of the impact on its participants

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

*

Educational success in high-risk settings: Contributions of the Chicago Longitudinal Study
Reynolds, Arthur J., 1999
Journal of School Psychology, 37(4), 345-354

Findings from four studies on the educational outcomes of high-risk children, using information from the Chicago Longitudinal Study

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Education for four-year-olds: State initiatives
Gallagher, James J., 2001
(Technical Report No. 2). Chapel Hill, NC: National Center for Early Development and Learning.

A categorical study of the facilitating factors and barriers to the establishment of state-funded prekindergarten programs in five states

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

*

Long-term effects of an early childhood intervention on educational achievement and juvenile arrest: A 15-year follow-up of low-income children in public schools
Reynolds, Arthur J., 2001
JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 285(18), 2239-2346

An article on the effects of the Chicago Child Parent Center Program, a comprehensive early intervention for children from low-income families, on school outcomes and juvenile arrests fifteen years postprogram.

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

*

Paths of effects of early childhood intervention on educational attainment and delinquency: A confirmatory analysis of the Chicago Child-Parent Centers
Reynolds, Arthur J., 2004
Child Development, 75(5), 1299-1328

An investigation of the influence of five different mechanisms of change on children enrolled in the Chicago Longitudinal Study (CLS) of the Child-Parent Centers (CPC) program

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN): My Exposure to Violence (Subject), Wave 2, 1997-2000
Earls, Felton, 2006
Earls, Felton J., Jeanne Brooks-Gunn, Stephen W. Raudenbush, and Robert J. Sampson. PROJECT ON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IN CHICAGO NEIGHBORHOODS (PHDCN): MY EXPOSURE TO VIOLENCE (SUBJECT), WAVE 2, 1997-2000 [Computer file]. ICPSR13617-v1. Boston, MA: Harvard Medical School [producer], 2002. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2005-12-06.

The Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN) was a large-scale, interdisciplinary study of how families, schools, and neighborhoods affect child and adolescent development. One component of the PHDCN was the Longitudinal Cohort Study, which was a series of coordinated longitudinal studies that followed over 6,000 randomly selected children, adolescents, and young adults, and their primary caregivers over time to examine the changing circumstances of their lives, as well as the personal characteristics, that might lead them toward or away from a variety of antisocial behaviors. Numerous measures were administered to respondents to gauge various aspects of human development, including individual differences, as well as family, peer, and school influences. Once such measure was the subject self-report version of the Exposure to Violence. For Wave 2, a much more detailed version of the instrument than was used in Wave 1 was developed to assess exposure to violence. It was called, My Exposure to Violence (Subject), or ETVS. This detailed subject self-report instrument was administered to Cohorts 9 to 15 and obtained information regarding the subject's lifetime and past year exposure to violent events. In addition, a short form of the subject self-report instrument was used with subjects in Cohort 6. The subject self-report instrument is complemented by the parent-report instrument PROJECT ON HUMAN DEVELOPMENT IN CHICAGO NEIGHBORHOODS (PHDCN): MY CHILD'S EXPOSURE TO VIOLENCE, WAVE 2, 1997-2000 (ICPSR 13619).

Data Sets


*

Research on early childhood interventions in the confirmatory mode
Reynolds, Arthur J., 2004
Children and Youth Services Review, 26(1), 15-38

A discussion of the use of confirmatory program evaluation as a method for addressing questions in research on early childhood interventions (i.e., reliability of long-term effects of large scale programs) using examples from the Chicago Longitudinal Study

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Select Citation
[1]  

Search Feedback


 



Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate