Browse the Collection

RC Produced by Research Connections

* Peer Reviewed Journal

Current Filters: New in last 90 days [remove]; Classification:Funded Areas [remove];

9 results found.
[1]  
Select Citation
Result Resource Type

A comparison of pre-k plans
First Focus, April, 2013
Washington, DC: First Focus.

A comparison of provisions in four federal early learning proposals

Fact Sheets & Briefs


get fulltext

Early childhood in the president's FY 2014 budget
First Focus, April, 2013
Washington, DC: First Focus.

An examination of provisions related to early childhood in the president's proposed fiscal year 2014 budget

Fact Sheets & Briefs


get fulltext

Early education in the governor's FY 2014 budget
Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center, 12 February, 2013
Boston: Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center.

An overview of provisions related to early education in the Massachusetts governor's proposed 2014 fiscal year budget

Fact Sheets & Briefs


get fulltext

Keeping the promise of preschool for New Jersey's children
Rice, Cynthia, February, 2013
Newark, NJ: Advocates for Children of New Jersey.

A study of the role of state funding for preschool in New Jersey school districts, based on surveys from administrators in 46 school district receiving limited state preschool funding and on interviews with administrators in 4 districts receiving full state preschool funding

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Overview: Child care and early learning in the governor's 2013-15 budget
Edie, David, 15 March, 2013
Madison, WI: Wisconsin Council on Children and Families.

An examination of provisions related to child care and early learning in the Wisconsin governor's proposed 2013-2015 budget

Fact Sheets & Briefs


get fulltext

The preschool market in this election year
Wilson, Mike, 2012
Sweet Springs, MO: MCH Strategic Data.

An overview of sources of and recent trends in public funding for preschool

Fact Sheets & Briefs


get fulltext

*

Public preferences for government spending in Canada
Ramji, Sabrina, October, 2012
International journal for equity in health, 11(), 1-10

This study considers three questions: 1. What are the Canadian public's prioritization preferences for new government spending on a range of public health-related goods outside the scope of the country's national system of health insurance? 2. How homogenous or heterogeneous is the Canadian public in terms of these preferences? 3. What factors are predictive of the Canadian public's preferences for new government spending? Data were collected in 2008 from a national random sample of Canadian adults through a telephone interview survey (n =1,005). Respondents were asked to rank five spending priorities in terms of their preference for new government spending. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted. As a first priority, Canadian adults prefer spending on child care (26.2%), followed by pharmacare (23.1%), dental care (20.8%), home care (17.2%), and vision care (12.7%). Sociodemographic characteristics predict spending preferences, based on the social position and needs of respondents. Policy leaders need to give fair consideration to public preferences in priority setting approaches in order to ensure that public health-related goods are distributed in a manner that best suits population needs. (author abstract)

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

The sequester deprives families of access to affordable, high-quality child care
National Women's Law Center, May, 2013
Washington, DC: National Women's Law Center.

An overview of the implications for low income families of federal child care funding cuts

Fact Sheets & Briefs


get fulltext

State pre-k funding: 2012-13 school year
Griffith, Michael, April, 2013
Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.

An examination of changes in state funding for prekindergarten programs from fiscal year 2011-2012 through fiscal year 2012-2013

Fact Sheets & Briefs


get fulltext

Select Citation
[1]  

Search Feedback


 



Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate