Browse the Collection

RC Produced by Research Connections

* Peer Reviewed Journal

Current Filters: Classification:Economic & Social [remove];

14 results found.
[1]  
Select Citation
Result Resource Type

*

Changing policies, changing impacts: Employment and earnings of child-care subsidy recipients in the era of welfare reform
Queralt, Magaly, 2000
Social Service Review, 74(4), 588-619

A study that examines the employment and earnings of current and former recipients of welfare benefits and child care subsidies and assesses the impact of increased funding for child care and other policy changes.

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Child care and welfare reform
Adams, Gina, 2002
(Welfare Reform & Beyond Policy Brief No. 14). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

An overview the evolution of federal child care subsidy policy since 1996, a discussion of the use of subsidized child care among low-income populations, and an identification of possible themes in the debate over the reauthorization of federal funds for the subsidy, expansion, and improvement of child care and early education services

Fact Sheets & Briefs


get fulltext

Child care assistance in 2005: State cuts continue
Matthews, Hannah, 2006
Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy.

An overview of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) and Child Care and Development Block Grant (CCDBG) funds that states devoted to child care spending in 2005

Fact Sheets & Briefs


get fulltext

Early childhood education: An economic development strategy
Strategies for Children,
Boston: Strategies for Children.

A brief on papers viewing investment in early childhood education as an economic development strategy

Fact Sheets & Briefs


Executive summary: The incentives of government programs and the well-being of families
Joint Center for Poverty Research, 2000
Chicago: Joint Center for Poverty Research.

A synthesis of the conference proceedings on incentives of government programs and the well being of poor families

Executive Summary


Impact of free primary education on early childhood development in Kenya
Kaga, Yoshie, 2006
(UNESCO Policy Brief on Early Childhood No. 30). Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation.

An overview of the benefits and policy implications of free primary school education provision in Kenya

Fact Sheets & Briefs


get fulltext

*

Sampling errors and confidence intervals for order statistics: Implementing the Family Support Act and welfare reform
Horrace, William, 1998
Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, 24(3-4), 181-207

A study of child care market rates across the state of Massachusetts in 1993 and 1994, including a statistical analysis of child care subsidy reimbursement percentiles and issues involved in calculating those percentiles

Reports & Papers


The Senate's $6 billion child care provision: A critical, but modest investment
Ewen, Danielle, 2005
Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy.

An article supporting the approval of a Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) reauthorization bill that would increase funding to child care assistance for low income families by $6 billion

Other


get fulltext

*

Spending inequalities for children's programs in Texas
Grubb, W. Norton, 1982
Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 461, 53-62

A study of expenditure inequalities in funding patterns of noneducational programs for children and youth in Texas emphasizing measures of expenditure inequalities for a variety of programs such as income support, nutrition, child care, juvenile justice programs, and several social and psychological services

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

States are cutting TANF and child care programs: Supports for low-income working families and welfare-to-work programs are particularly hard hit
Parrott, Sharon, 2003
Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

An informational table-formatted report detailing state funding cuts in government aided child care programs; each state is described in terms of which programs are being affected and how the program is affected

Other


get fulltext

The Texas child care subsidy program after devolution to the local level: A product of the Study of Child Care Devolution in Texas
Schexnayder, Deanna, 2004
Austin: University of Texas at Austin, Ray Marshall Center for the Study of Human Resources.

A report analyzing the devolution of subsidized child care policies and program management to local workforce development boards in Texas from 1998 to 2003

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

The Texas child care subsidy program after devolution to the local level: A product of the Study of Child Care Devolution in Texas [Executive summary]
Schexnayder, Deanna, 2004
Austin: University of Texas at Austin, Ray Marshall Center for the Study of Human Resources.

Summary of a report analyzing the devolution of subsidized child care policies and program management to local workforce development boards in Texas from 1998 to 20003

Executive Summary


get fulltext

Toward a decade of indifference: Administration ignores child care needs of working families
Ewen, Danielle, 2006
Washington, DC: Center for Law and Social Policy.

An analysis of the possible social consequences of the 2007 presidential budget proposal in which funding is frozen for the Child Care and Development Block Grant (CCDBG)

Fact Sheets & Briefs


get fulltext

*

Who gets what from government?: Distributional consequences of child-care assistance policies
Durfee, Alesha, 2006
Journal of Marriage and the Family, 68(3), 733-748

An analysis of the level and distribution of child care assistance using data from the New York Social Indicators Survey to examine how many families receive assistance, how much assistance is received, and how the total assistance levels vary in terms of family, child, and parent characteristics

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Select Citation
[1]  

Search Feedback


 



Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate