Browse the Collection

RC Produced by Research Connections

* Peer Reviewed Journal

Current Filters: Author:Halfon, Neal [remove]; Classification:Coordination & Integration [remove];

3 results found.
[1]  
Select Citation
Result Resource Type

Building bridges: A comprehensive system for healthy development and school readiness
Halfon, Neal, 2004
(Building State Early Childhood Comprehensive Systems Series No. 1). University of California, Los Angeles, National Center for Infant and Early Childhood Health Policy.

A presentation of a set of principles that states can use to advance their planning process, reach out to new partners, develop collaborative strategies, and build a foundation for the implementation phase of the State Early Childhood Comprehensive Systems (SECCS) initiative

Reports & Papers


Partnering schools, communities and Proposition 10: Financing considerations for early childhood initiatives
Flynn, Margaret, January, 2002
Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center for Healthier Children, Families, and Communities.

A discussion of Proposition 10, a proposal of a flexible funding structure for the development of a comprehensive system of early childhood education and care services in California

Other


Partnering schools, communities and Proposition 10: Financing considerations for early childhood initiatives [Executive summary]
Flynn, Margaret, January, 2002
Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center for Healthier Children, Families, and Communities.

A discussion of Proposition 10, a proposal of a flexible funding structure for the development of a comprehensive system of early childhood education and care services in California

Executive Summary


Select Citation
[1]  

Search Feedback


 



Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate