Browse the Collection

RC Produced by Research Connections

* Peer Reviewed Journal

Current Filters: Pub Year:2000 [remove]; Classification:Special Needs Children [remove];

8 results found.
[1]  
Select Citation
Result Resource Type

*

All children are ready to learn: An emergent versus readiness perspective in early literacy assessment
Erickson, Karen A., August 2000
Seminars in Speech and Language, 21(3), 193-203

A discussion of the differences between emergent literacy and reading readiness and a description of Marie Clay's contribution to assessing reading readiness as well as strategies to help implement her assessment techniques with young children with special needs

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Benefits of a comprehensive technology system in an early childhood setting: Results of a three-year study
Hutinger, Patricia, 2000
Macomb: Western Illinois University, Center for Best Practices in Early Childhood.

An study of the effects of a comprehensive system of technology integration and services for children with disabilities on student engagement, fine motor skills, visual motor skills, emergent literacy, and communication and social skills

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

*

Demonstration of classroom survival skills in kindergarten: A five-year transition study of children with intellectual disabilities
Kemp, Coral, 2000
Educational Psychology, 20(4), 393-411

A comparison of classroom skills utilized by children with disabilities and those utilized by their peers, based on a sample of 37 children who completed a year-long model inclusive program at Macquarie University in Australia

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Head Start teachers' conceptions of full inclusion of young children: A study of four teachers
Naidu, Inbaranjani, 2000
Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kent State University, Kent, OH

An inquiry into the opinions of two Head Start teachers and their assistants on the full inclusion of children with disabilities into the classroom

Reports & Papers


*

Kindergarten teachers' perceptions of intervention strategies for young children with mild learning and behavior problems
Tafa, Eufimia, 2000
International Journal of Early Childhood, 32(2), 45-58

An evaluation of the intervention strategies used by kindergarten teachers for children with mild learning or behavioral problems, based on a survey of 154 kindergarten teachers in Greece, using a 4-point Likert scale to rate 40 intervention strategies

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

*

Practices of coteachers in inclusive preschool classrooms
Noonan, Mary, 2000
NHSA Dialog, 3(2), 258-271

An exploration of the practices of teachers in inclusive settings, based on a sample of 14 teachers instructing 110 normal and special needs children in a community-based, inclusive setting in Hawaii

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

*

(Re-) Constructing pre-linguistic interpersonal processes to promote language development in young children with deviant or delayed communication skills
Smith, Carolyn A., September 2000
British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(3), 369-389

An evaluation of an early intervention focused on promoting language development for preschool children with special needs using an interpersonal framework for communication rather than focusing only on speech production

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

*

Teachers' reported transition practices for children transitioning into kindergarten and first grade
La Paro, Karen M., 2000
Exceptional Children, 67(1), 7-20

A national survey of kindergarten and first grade teachers' reported use of transitional practices for young children with special needs with respect to specific children and general classroom population

Reports & Papers


Select Citation
[1]  

Search Feedback


 



Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate