Browse the Collection

RC Produced by Research Connections

* Peer Reviewed Journal

Current Filters: Pub Year:2002 [remove]; Classification:Integrated Services Programs [remove];

8 results found.
[1]  
Select Citation
Result Resource Type

Age 21 cost-benefit analysis of the Title I Chicago child-parent centers
Reynolds, Arthur J., 2002
(Discussion Paper No. 1245-02). University of Wisconsin--Madison, Institute for Research on Poverty.

A cost benefit analysis of the federally funded Chicago Child-Parent Center program using data from the Chicago Longitudinal Study from a cohort of children born in 1980.

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Family-based intensive services: Home visiting and parent support programs that start in the first three years
Fraser, Jeffery, 2002
In C. J. Groark, K. E. Mehaffie, R. B. McCall, M. T. Greenberg, & Universities Children's Policy Collaborative (Eds.), From science to policy: Research on issues, programs and policies in early care and education. Harrisburg: Pennsylvania Governor's Task Force on Early Childhood Education. (No longer accessible as of December 11, 2012).

A review of the design, effectiveness, and cost of selected home visiting and family support programs for infants and toddlers

Other


Parenting education: Programs that provide knowledge and skill development for parents of children birth to five years
Fraser, Jeffery, 2002
In C. J. Groark, K. E. Mehaffie, R. B. McCall, M. T. Greenberg, & Universities Children's Policy Collaborative (Eds.), From science to policy: Research on issues, programs and policies in early care and education. Harrisburg: Pennsylvania Governor's Task Force on Early Childhood Education. (No longer accessible as of December 10, 2012).

A review of the goals, design, effectiveness, and costs of several stand-alone short-term parent education programs for parents of young children

Other


Quality child care and community development: What is the connection?
Ball, Jessica, 2002
In M.V. Hayes & L.T. Foster (Eds.), Too small to see, too big to ignore: Child health and well-being in British Columbia (pp. 75-102). Canada: University of Victoria (B.C.), Western Geographical Press.

A study of the relationship between quality child care and community development in promoting the coordination and integration of services for children and their families in Canada

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Smart Start effectiveness for young children and their families in North Carolina: Annual evaluation report
FPG Child Development Institute, 2002
Chapel Hill, NC: FPG Child Development Institute.

An evaluation of the comprehensive, community-based initiative, Smart Start, for children under six years of age and their families in North Carolina

Other


get fulltext

A study of 'extended schools' demonstration projects
Dyson, Alan, October 2002
(Research Brief No. 381). Nottingham, United Kingdom: Great Britain, Department for Education and Skills.

A presentation of findings from a study on the implementation of the extended schools model, an expansion of school services to include family and community support services, in districts in three areas of England

Fact Sheets & Briefs


get fulltext

A study of the extended schools demonstration projects
Dyson, Alan, October 2002
(Research Report No. 381). Nottingham, United Kingdom: Great Britain, Department for Education and Skills.

A presentation of findings from a study on the implementation of the extended schools model, an expansion of school services to include family and community support services, in districts in three areas of England

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Toronto First Duty starting gate report: Implementing integrated foundations for early childhood
Corter, Carl, 2002
Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Toronto First Duty.

A description of Toronto First Duty, a multi-site program that integrates child care, early education, and family support services, and its evaluation

Other


get fulltext

Select Citation
[1]  

Search Feedback


 



Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate