Browse the Collection
|
|
Produced by Research Connections
Peer Reviewed JournalCurrent Filters: Pub Year:2002 [remove]; Full Text:no [remove]; Classification:Recruitment, Retention & Job Satisfaction [remove];
5 results found.|
Select Citation
|
Result | Resource Type |
|
|
|
|
Early education 2002: Status report for the Greater Kansas City area An overview of building an infrastructure for high quality early education in Missouri, including community wide access to quality child care, workforce retention and funding the system |
Other
|
|
|
|
|
Principals' preferences for developmentally appropriate and traditional practices in Georgia's Prekindergarten Program A description of principals’ preferences and prekindergarten teachers’ perceptions of their principal’s preference for developmentally appropriate or traditional teaching practices in Georgia’s Prekindergarten Program |
Reports & Papers
|
|
|
|
|
Project REWARD: San Luis Obispo County: Year 1 implementation study report An account of the Year 1 implementation of the Project REWARD child care retention initiative (CRI) in San Luis Obispo County in California, based on phone interviews with and site visits of program participants |
Reports & Papers
|
|
|
|
|
San Francisco CARES program: Year 1 qualitative implementation study An account of the implementation of the San Francisco County CARES (SF CARES) program, based on information gathered through 11 focus group interviews with program planners, staff, and child care providers in San Francisco County, California |
Reports & Papers
|
|
|
|
|
Ventura County early care and education compensation/retention initiative project: Ventura County: Year 1 implementation study report Findings from a qualitative implementation study of the first year of the Ventura Incentive Project in Ventura County, one of several child care retention incentive models being implemented throughout California to improve retention rates and professional development opportunities in the child care industry by providing monetary incentives to eligible child care providers, based on data from site visits and focus groups conducted with project staff and participants, as well as interviews with members of the advisory board and/or representatives from partner organizations |
Reports & Papers
|
|
Select Citation
|
