Save this Search
Your search has returned 25 results or fewer; for that reason additional filtering options are not available.
Browse the Collection
Produced by Research Connections
Peer Reviewed Journal
3 results found.
Resource Type:Methods ;
Classification:Parents & Families [remove] ;
Child care costs in the Current Population Survey's Annual Social and Economic Supplement (CPS ASEC): A comparison to SIPP
Macartney, Suzanne E., January 2011
(SEHSD Working Paper No. 2011-1). Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.
A comparison of household child care expenses estimates in the Current Population Survey Annual Social and Economic Supplement and the Survey of Income and Program Participation
Child care data in the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP): Inaccuracies and corrections
Besharov, Douglas J., 2006
College Park: University of Maryland, School of Public Policy, Welfare Reform Academy.
A critique of the child care module in the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) identifying general data problems, including biased under coverage, high non-response, significant attrition, weighting and imputation biases, and inconsistencies across panels due to changes in the design of the SIPP's sample and questionnaire
Family-provider relationship quality: Review of existing measures of family-provider relationships
United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, November, 2012
(OPRE Report No. 2012-47). Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.
A review of instruments that measure the quality of family-provider relationships, and a discussion of considerations for the future development of family-provider relationship quality measures
Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do
not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and
© 2013 The Regents of the University of Michigan