Browse the Collection

RC Produced by Research Connections

* Peer Reviewed Journal

Current Filters: Resource Type:Executive Summary [remove]; Classification:Process Quality [remove];

37 results found.
|<    <    1   [2]  
Select Citation
Result Resource Type

Ready to Learn workshop participation: Short-term impacts: Final report [Executive summary]
Johnson, Amy W., 23 December, 2003
Alexandria, VA: Public Broadcasting Service.

A summary of an experimental, random assignment component of the comprehensive evaluation of Ready to Learn--a program in which Public Broadcasting Service member stations broadcast a mandated number of hours of children's programming and coordinators at each station engage in outreach activities (including parent and early childhood educator workshops) to facilitate the use of this programming as an educational tool--that focused on the short-term impacts of outreach activities on parents' and early childhood educators' behaviors, based on comparing assessments of workshop participants and nonparticipants

Executive Summary


Researching effective pedagogy in the early years [Executive summary]
Siraj-Blatchford, Iram, June 2002
(Research Report No. 356). London, United Kingdom: Great Britain, Department for Education and Skills.

A summary of an inquiry into the use of teaching practices to promote children’s developmental progress, based on case studies of a subsample of 12 Effective Provision of Pre-school Education (EPPE) project classrooms, and 2 reception classrooms in England

Executive Summary


get fulltext

Response to the Georgia study of early care and education [Executive summary]
Bright From the Start (Organization : Georgia), March, 2010
Atlanta, GA: Bright form the Start.

A summary of an overview of a study on the quality of preschool and public prekindergarten programs in Georgia during the 2008-2009 school year

Executive Summary


get fulltext

Rochester Early Childhood Assessment Partnership: 2006-07 tenth annual report [Executive summary]
Gramiak, Walt, October 2007
(Technical Report and Works in Progress Series: Number T07-005). Rochester, NY: Children's Institute.

A summary of findings from the tenth year of an assessment of the quality, parental satisfaction, and the outcomes of children in early childhood programs in Rochester, New York, based on parent surveys observations of children and their classrooms

Executive Summary


get fulltext

Rochester Early Childhood Assessment Partnership: 2007-08 eleventh annual report [Executive summary]
Hightower, A. Dirk, October 2008
(Technical Report and Works in Progress Series: Number T08-006). Rochester, NY: Children's Institute.

A summary of findings from the eleventh year of an assessment of the quality, parental satisfaction, and the outcomes of children in early childhood programs in Rochester, New York, based on parent surveys observations of children and their classroom

Executive Summary


get fulltext

Rochester Early Childhood Assessment Partnership: 2007-08 twelfth annual report: Executive summary
Lehmann, Christine, October 2009
(Number T09-008). Rochester, NY: Children's Institute.

A summary of findings from the twelfth year of an assessment of the quality, parental satisfaction, and the outcomes of children in early childhood programs in Rochester, New York, based on parent surveys observations of children and their classrooms

Executive Summary


get fulltext

Rochester Early Childhood Assessment Partnership: 2009-10 thirteenth annual report [Executive summary]
Taylor, Crystal, October 2010
(Number T10-004).

A summary of findings from the thirteenth year of an assessment of the quality, parental satisfaction, and the outcomes of children in early childhood programs in Rochester, New York, based on parent surveys observations of children and their classrooms

Executive Summary


get fulltext

Take a giant step: A blueprint for teaching young children in a digital age [Executive summary]
Barron, Brigid, September, 2011
New York: Joan Ganz Cooney Center.

A summary of a discussion of issues and challenges related to the integration of digital technologies into early education

Executive Summary


Too young for respect?: Realising respect for young children in their everyday environments: A cross-cultural analysis [Executive summary]
George, Shanti, July 2009
(Working Papers in Early Childhood Development 54). The Hague, Netherlands: Bernard van Leer Foundation.

A summary of a discussion of different views of the respect due to children, with two case studies, from Germany and Israel, illustrating adult-child relationships based on mutual respect

Executive Summary


get fulltext

Watching teachers work: Using observation tools to promote effective teaching in the early years and early grades [Executive summary]
Guernsey, Lisa, November, 2011
Washington, DC: New America Foundation.

A summary of a discussion of the use of observation measures in early childhood and elementary classrooms to identify, promote, and reward high-quality teaching

Executive Summary


get fulltext

Work with young children: A case study of Denmark, Hungary and Spain: Summary of consolidated report
Korintus, Marta, 2004
London: University of London, Thomas Coram Research Unit, Care Work in Europe.

A summary of a report on the center based, child care workforce in Denmark, Hungary, and Spain.

Executive Summary


Year one context studies: A report to the Ready to Learn Initiative [Executive summary]
Education Development Center, September, 2011
Arlington, VA: Public Broadcasting Service.

A summary of findings from both a survey study and an observation study of the use of digital media and technology to support math and literacy instruction in early learning settings, based on survey responses from 106 preschool teachers and 86 summer learning program instructors, and on classroom observations and teacher and program director interviews for a subset of 32 classrooms

Executive Summary


get fulltext

Select Citation
|<    <    1   [2]  

Search Feedback


 



Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate