Save this Search
Your search has returned 25 results or fewer; for that reason additional filtering options are not available.
Browse the Collection
Produced by Research Connections
Peer Reviewed Journal
4 results found.
Resource Type:Methods ;
Pub Year:2007 [remove] ;
Classification:Research & Evaluation Methods [remove] ;
Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Birth Cohort (ECLS-B): Psychometric report for the 2-year data collection: Methodology report
Andreassen, Carol, August 2007
(NCES 2007-084). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
A description of the characteristics and field performance of instruments used in the two-year data collection of the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Birth Cohort (ECLS-B), a nationally representative longitudinal study following children born in 2001 in the United States from birth until kindergarten
Methodologies to evaluate early childhood development programs
Behrman, Jere R., December 2007
(Doing Impact Evaluation No. 9). Washington, DC: World Bank.
A discussion of methodological considerations involved in evaluating the impacts of early childhood development programs
Parental use of child care: A guide for constructing parent surveys
Emlen, Arthur, January 2007
Corvallis: Oregon Child Care Research Partnership
A guide for constructing surveys on factors driving parental use of supplemental child care, including discussions of constructs and variables related to household, parent, work, and child characteristics, child care arrangements, and parent choice
A review of methods and instruments used in state and local school readiness evaluations
Brown, Elizabeth Glyn, August 2007
(Issues & Answers, REL 2007-No. 004). Washington, DC: Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast.
A review of methods and instruments used to measure child outcomes in state and local school readiness initiatives
Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do
not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and
© 2013 The Regents of the University of Michigan