Browse the Collection

RC Produced by Research Connections

* Peer Reviewed Journal

Current Filters: Author:Moodie, Shannon [remove];

19 results found.
[1]  
Select Citation
Result Resource Type

2011 District of Columbia early childhood risk and reach assessment
Moodie, Shannon,
Washington, DC: District of Columbia, Office of Early Childhood Education.

An examination of the geographic distribution in the District of Columbia of family risk indicators, children's reading and math proficiency, and early childhood programs

Other


get fulltext

Beyond classroom-based measures for preschoolers: Addressing the gaps in measures for home-based care and care for infants and toddlers
Sandstrom, Heather, 2011
In M. Zaslow, I. Martinez-Beck, K. Tout, & T. Halle (Eds.), Quality measurement in early childhood settings (pp. 317-343). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes

A discussion of appropriateness of indicators in the assessment of quality in family child care settings, based on recommendations from the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) and the National Association for Family Child Care (NAFCC)

Other


The Child Care Quality Rating System (QRS) Assessment: Compendium of quality rating systems and evaluations
United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, April, 2010
Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.

A compendium of information on quality rating systems of child care and early education programs, including a proposal of an analytic framework for the assessment and evaluation of quality rating systems and profiles of such systems in 26 states

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

The Child Care Quality Rating System (QRS) Assessment: Compendium of quality rating systems and evaluations [Executive summary]
United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, April 2010
Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.

A summary of a compendium of information on quality rating systems of child care and early education programs, including a proposal of an analytic framework for the assessment and evaluation of quality rating systems and profiles of such systems in 26 states

Executive Summary


get fulltext

District of Columbia early childhood risk and reach assessment: Fiscal year 2009
Moodie, Shannon, 2010
Washington, DC: District of Columbia, Office of the State Superintendent of Education, Division of Early Childhood Education.

An examination of the geographic distribution in Washington, DC, of family risk indicators and city-supported early childhood programs

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Family engagement and family-sensitive caregiving: Identifying common core elements and issues related to measurement
United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, October, 2011
(Issue Brief OPRE 2011-26b). Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.

A summary of a meeting on the identification of core elements of and methods to measure family engagement and family-sensitive caregiving in early care and education settings

Fact Sheets & Briefs


get fulltext

Family engagement, diverse families, and early childhood education programs: An integrated review of the literature
Halgunseth, Linda C., 2009
Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.

A discussion of research on the engagement of ethnically diverse families in early childhood education programs

Other


get fulltext

Family-provider relationship quality: Review of existing measures of family-provider relationships
United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, November, 2012
(OPRE Report No. 2012-47). Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.

A review of instruments that measure the quality of family-provider relationships, and a discussion of considerations for the future development of family-provider relationship quality measures

Methods


get fulltext

Family-provider relationships: A multidisciplinary review of high quality practices and associations with family, child, and provider outcomes
United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, October, 2011
(Issue Brief OPRE 2011-26a). Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.

A review of research to identify high-quality practices in family-provider relationships and explore the relationship of these practices to child, family, and provider outcomes

Literature Review


get fulltext

Kentucky STARS for KIDS NOW process evaluation: Alternative rating structures for Kentucky STARS for KIDS NOW
Isner, Tabitha K., January, 2012
(Evaluation Brief No. 6). Washington, DC: Child Trends.

A discussion of child care quality rating and improvement system (QRIS) models with alternative rating structures to STARS for KIDS NOW, Kentucky's QRIS, and an estimation and comparison of provider quality ratings under STARS for KIDS NOW and the alternative models, based on interviews with 62 providers participating in STARS for KIDS NOW

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Kentucky STARS for KIDS NOW process evaluation: Collaboration and coordination in the Kentucky STARS for KIDS NOW technical assistance system
Daily, Sarah, January, 2012
(Evaluation Brief No. 5). Washington, DC: Child Trends.

A study of both child care and technical assistance providers' perceptions of coordination and collaboration within the technical assistance system for STARS for KIDS NOW, Kentucky's child care quality rating and improvement system, based on interviews with 62 participating providers, 13 professional development counselors, and 16 STARS for KIDS NOW quality coordinators

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Kentucky STARS for KIDS NOW process evaluation: Evaluation of Kentucky's child care resource & referral system
Starr, Rebecca, January, 2012
(Evaluation Brief No. 7). Washington, DC: Child Trends.

A study of the child care resource and referral system in Kentucky, including provider and parent services and community stakeholder collaboration, based on surveys of resource and referral training participants, interviews with resource and referral agency staff and stakeholders, and analyses of administrative and other secondary data

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Kentucky STARS for KIDS NOW process evaluation: Executive summary
Tout, Kathryn, January, 2012
(Evaluation Brief No. 1). Washington, DC: Child Trends.

A summary of an evaluation of STARS for KIDS NOW, Kentucky's child care quality rating and improvement system, that examines the STARS standards, rating structure, technical assistance system, outreach efforts, service coordination, and administrative processes

Executive Summary


get fulltext

Kentucky STARS for KIDS NOW process evaluation: Findings from the Kentucky Early Care and Education and School-Age Care Household Survey
Starr, Rebecca, January, 2012
(Evaluation Brief No. 8). Washington, DC: Child Trends.

A study of Kentucky households' child care use, selection, options, and expenses, based on interviews with 501 randomly selected Kentucky households with children who are 12 years old or younger and in child care

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Kentucky STARS for KIDS NOW process evaluation: Overview of methods
Isner, Tabitha K., January, 2012
(Evaluation Brief No. 2). Washington, DC: Child Trends.

A discussion of the research questions, methods, and data sources from an evaluation of STARS for KIDS NOW, Kentucky's child care quality rating and improvement system

Other


get fulltext

Kentucky STARS for KIDS NOW process evaluation: Providers' perceptions of the Kentucky STARS for KIDS NOW rating process
Moodie, Shannon, January, 2012
(Evaluation Brief No. 3). Washington, DC: Child Trends.

A study of child care providers' motivations, perceptions, and challenges related to participation in STARS for KIDS NOW, Kentucky's child care quality rating and improvement system, based on interviews with 62 participating providers and 58 STARS for KIDS NOW quality coordinators

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Kentucky STARS for KIDS NOW process evaluation: Technical assistance provided to and received by STARS for KIDS NOW programs
Daily, Sarah, January, 2012
(Evaluation Brief No. 4). Washington, DC: Child Trends.

A study of patterns of technical assistance services for child care providers participating in STARS for KIDS NOW, Kentucky's child care quality rating and improvement system, based on interviews with 62 participating providers, 13 professional development counselors, and 58 STARS for KIDS NOW quality coordinators

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Quality rating and improvement systems (QRIS) and family-sensitive caregiving in early care and education arrangements: Promising directions and challenges
United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, October, 2011
(Issue Brief OPRE 2011-11d). Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.

A discussion of the alignment of family-sensitive care model concepts with child care quality rating and improvement system (QRIS) indicators for family partnerships

Fact Sheets & Briefs


get fulltext

Understanding and choosing assessments and developmental screeners for young children ages 3-5: Profiles of selected measures: Final report
United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, June, 2011
(OPRE Report No. 2011-23). Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.

A compendium of assessments and developmental screeners for preschool-age children, with profiles of their characteristics, reliability, and validity

Methods


get fulltext

Select Citation
[1]  

Search Feedback


 



Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate