Browse the Collection

RC Produced by Research Connections

* Peer Reviewed Journal

Current Filters: Author:Doherty, Gillian [remove];

23 results found.
[1]  
Select Citation
Result Resource Type

Child care by default or design?: An exploration of differences between non-profit and for-profit Canadian child care centres using the You Bet I Care! data sets
Doherty, Gillian, 2002
(Occasional Paper No. 18). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto, Childcare Resource and Research Unit.

An analysis of the differences in child care quality in commercial versus publicly operated child care centers in Canada

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Conception to age six: The foundation of school-readiness
Doherty, Gillian, January, 2007
Toronto, Ontario, Canada: The Learning Partnership.

An overview of the research and policy on school readiness in Canada

Other


Conception to age six: The foundation of school-readiness [Executive summary]
Doherty, Gillian, January, 2007
Toronto, Ontario, Canada: The Learning Partnership.

A summary of an overview of the research and policy on school readiness in Canada

Executive Summary


Ensuring the best start in life: Targeting versus universality in early childhood development
Doherty, Gillian, December 2007
IRPP Choices, 13(8)

A review of research from Canada and the United States that identifies strategies for promoting young, vulnerable children's healthy development in Canada by considering four policy issues: 1) targeted versus universal approaches, 2) conditions for high-quality early childhood education, 3) benefits ands costs associated with different programs, and 4) requirements for supporting the health development of all Canadian children

Literature Review


get fulltext

Ensuring the best start in life: Targeting versus universality in early childhood development [Executive summary]
Doherty, Gillian, December 2007
IRPP Choices, 13(8), 50.

A summary of a review of research from Canada and the United States that identifies strategies for promoting young, vulnerable children's healthy development in Canada by considering four policy issues: 1) targeted versus universal approaches, 2) conditions for high-quality early childhood education, 3) benefits ands costs associated with different programs, and 4) requirements for supporting the health development of all Canadian children

Executive Summary


get fulltext

The Mentoring Pairs for Child Care project: Final outcome report
Doherty, Gillian, May, 2011
Thorold, Ontario, Canada: Early Childhood Community Development Centre.

An evaluation of Mentoring Pairs for Child Care (MPCC), a project in Ontario to increase child care center quality through professional development and mentoring for child care supervisors, that examined changes in participants' attitudes and professionalism and child care center quality from pre- to post-MPCC participation

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

The Mentoring Pairs for Child Care project: Final outcome report [Executive summary]
Doherty, Gillian, May, 2011
Thorold, Ontario, Canada: Early Childhood Community Development Centre.

A summary of an evaluation of Mentoring Pairs for Child Care (MPCC), a project in Ontario to increase child care center quality through professional development and mentoring for child care supervisors, that examined changes in participants' attitudes and professionalism and child care center quality from pre- to post-MPCC participation

Executive Summary


get fulltext

OECD thematic review of early childhood education and care: Canadian background report
Doherty, Gillian, 2003
Ottawa, Ontario: Social Development Canada.

A study of the status of early childhood education and care (ECEC) funding and programs in Canada

Other


*

Predictors of quality in family child care
Doherty, Gillian, 2006
Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21(3), 296-312

An analysis of indicators of quality in regulated Canadian family child care homes, including provider's education level, training and experience, use of support services, and provider work environment

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Quality by design: What do we know about quality in early learning and child care, and what do we think?: A literature review
Friendly, Martha, 2005
Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto, Childcare Resource and Research Unit.

A review of research on factors that effect quality of early education and child care, looking at both the individual program level and at the policy level

Literature Review


get fulltext

Shedding new light on staff recruitment and retention challenges in child care
Doherty, Gillian, 2005
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Child Care Human Resources Sector Council.

A study on child care provider staff satisfaction and retention challenges in Canada

Reports & Papers


Shedding new light on staff recruitment and retention challenges in child care [Executive summary]
Doherty, Gillian, 2005
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Child Care Human Resources Sector Council.

A summary of a study identifying factors that predict recruitment and retention difficulties in the Canadian child care field

Executive Summary


get fulltext

*

Towards a predictive model of quality in Canadian child care centers
Goelman, Hillel, 2006
Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21(3), 280-295

A report of a large scale study of indicators of quality in Canadian child care centers as assessed by center observations combined with director and staff questionnaires reporting on regulatory, financial, and administrative information

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Unionization and quality in early childhood programs
Doherty, Gillian, 2002
Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Union of Public Employees.

A study of the impact of unionization on wages/benefits and working conditions of workers among non-profit child care centers in Canada

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

Workplace and workforce causes in the recruitment & retention of qualified child care staff
Doherty, Gillian, January 2002
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada: Child Care Connection Nova Scotia.

An overview of retention and turnover rates, compensation levels, and attidues toward work among child care workers in each Canadian province

Other


get fulltext

You bet I care!: A Canada-wide study on wages, working conditions, and practices in child care centres
Doherty, Gillian, 2000
Guelph, Ontario, Canada: University of Guelph, Centre for Work, Families and Well-Being.

A replication of a 1991 comprehensive nationally representative Canadian survey on wages and working conditions in child care centers, augmented by the collection of additional data on care practices

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

You bet I care!: A Canada-wide study on wages, working conditions, and practices in child care centres [Executive Summary]
Doherty, Gillian, 2000
Guelph, Ontario, Canada: University of Guelph, Centre for Work, Families and Well-Being.

An inquiry into the practices of child care centers and workers, based on a survey of 1,696 child care centers and directors and 4,154 staff members across Canada

Executive Summary


get fulltext

You bet I care!: Caring and learning environments: Quality in child care centres across Canada
Goelman, Hillel, 2000
Guelph, Ontario, Canada: University of Guelph, Centre for Families, Work and Well-Being.

A report documenting the findings from a Canadian study that explores the relationships between child care center quality and (1) center characteristics; (2) teacher wages and working conditions; and (3) teacher characteristics and attitudes

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

You bet I care!: Caring and learning environments: Quality in child care centres across Canada [Executive summary]
Goelman, Hillel, 2000
Guelph, Ontario, Canada: University of Guelph, Centre for Families, Work and Well-Being.

An observation and survey based study examining the relationship between Canadian center based child care quality and various factors, including staff wages, teacher characteristics, teacher attitudes, and work environment

Executive Summary


get fulltext

You bet I care!: Caring and learning environments: Quality in regulated family child care across Canada
Doherty, Gillian, 2000
Guelph, Ontario, Canada: University of Guelph, Centre for Families, Work and Well-Being.

Findings from a Canadian study exploring the relationships between quality in family child care homes and: (1) provider characteristics and attitudes; (2) provider income levels and working conditions; and (3) providers' use of various support services

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

You bet I care!: Caring and learning environments: Quality in regulated family child care across Canada [Executive summary]
Doherty, Gillian, 2000
Guelph, Ontario, Canada: University of Guelph, Centre for Families, Work and Well-Being.

A summary of findings from a Canadian study evaluating the relationship between quality family child care and provider characteristics

Executive Summary


get fulltext

You bet I care!: Policies and practices in Canadian family child care agencies
Doherty, Gillian, 2001
Guelph, Ontario, Canada: University of Guelph, Centre for Families, Work and Well-Being.

An examination of the ways Canadian family child care agencies monitor, supervise, and support child care providers, and furnish support to families, based on a questionnaire distributed to agencies in Alberta, Ontario and Québec

Reports & Papers


get fulltext

You bet I care!: Policies and practices in Canadian family child care agencies [Executive summary]
Doherty, Gillian, 2001
Guelph, Ontario, Canada: University of Guelph, Centre for Families, Work and Well-Being.

A summary of findings from a questionnaire completed by Canadian child care agency directors discussing how the agencies fulfill their primary roles and identifying major concerns with family child care programs

Executive Summary


get fulltext

Select Citation
[1]  

Search Feedback


 



Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate