Browse the Collection

RC Produced by Research Connections

* Peer Reviewed Journal

Current Filters: Resource Type:Methods [remove]; Author:Davis, Elizabeth E. [remove];

3 results found.
[1]  
Select Citation
Result Resource Type

Common challenges in the study of continuity of child care subsidy participation: CCPRC subsidy workgroup methodology research brief series
United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, December, 2012
(Methodological Brief OPRE 2012-55). Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.

A discussion of issues in designing studies of the dynamics of child care subsidy receipt

Methods


get fulltext

Guidebook for implementing a study on the dynamics of child care subsidy use
Grobe, Deana, 2003
Corvallis: Oregon Child Care Research Partnership.

A description of the methodology developed in the course of a five-state longitudinal study, based on administrative data from the child care subsidy program, on the dynamics of child care subsidy use--including characteristics of children and families who receive subsidies, services received, length of subsidy receipt spells, probability of reentry into the subsidy system, and stability of children's care arrangements while they are in the subsidy system--designed as a guide to enable states and researchers to conduct similar studies on this topic

Methods


get fulltext

Study of market prices: Validating child care market rate surveys
Grobe, Deana, September 2008
(Technical Report) Corvallis: Oregon State University Family Policy Program

Guidance for increasing the validity of child care market rate surveys, including the selection of survey design, data sources, and data collection methods, and a discussion of cost considerations

Methods


get fulltext

Select Citation
[1]  

Search Feedback


 



Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate