Search Results

RC Produced by Research Connections

* Peer Reviewed Journal

Current Search: authors:(CCB) OR publishers:(CCB) OR funders:(CCB) OR authors:(OPRE) OR publishers:(OPRE) OR funders:(OPRE)   
Current Filters: Resource Type:Methods [remove];

20 results found.
[1]  
Select Citation
Result Resource Type

Studying child care subsidies with secondary data sources: CCPRC subsidy workgroup methodology research brief series
United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, December, 2012
(Methodological Brief OPRE 2012-54). Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.

A discussion of the features of four large-scale data sets relevant to the study of child care subsidies

Methods


get fulltext

Common challenges in the study of continuity of child care subsidy participation: CCPRC subsidy workgroup methodology research brief series
United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, December, 2012
(Methodological Brief OPRE 2012-55). Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.

A discussion of issues in designing studies of the dynamics of child care subsidy receipt

Methods


get fulltext

Understanding and choosing assessments and developmental screeners for young children ages 3-5: Profiles of selected measures: Final report
United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, June, 2011
(OPRE Report No. 2011-23). Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.

A compendium of assessments and developmental screeners for preschool-age children, with profiles of their characteristics, reliability, and validity

Methods


get fulltext

Family-provider relationship quality: Review of existing measures of family-provider relationships
United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, November, 2012
(OPRE Report No. 2012-47). Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.

A review of instruments that measure the quality of family-provider relationships, and a discussion of considerations for the future development of family-provider relationship quality measures

Methods


get fulltext

Design phase of the National Study of Early Child Care Supply and Demand (NSECCSD): Final report
United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, January 31, 2010
Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.

A description of a proposed design for a study on the functions of supply and demand in the child care market, including a discussion of public policy questions addressed through the implementation of the proposed study

Methods


get fulltext

Design phase of the National Study of Child Care Supply and Demand (NSCCSD): Cognitive interview findings report for center-based provider questionnaire
United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, January 31, 2010
Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.

A discussion of the methodology of the design and content of a questionnaire to survey center-based child care providers for their participation in the assessment of the national supply of child care

Methods


get fulltext

Design phase of the National Study of Child Care Supply and Demand (NSCCSD): Cognitive interview findings report for home-based provider questionnaire
United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, January 31, 2010
Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.

A discussion of the methodology of the design and content of a questionnaire to survey home-based child care providers for their participation in the assessment of the national supply of child care

Methods


get fulltext

Design phase of the National Study of Child Care Supply and Demand (NSCCSD): Cognitive interview findings report for demand questionnaire
United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, January 31, 2010
Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.

A presentation of the development and content of a survey for the assessment of parental demand

Methods


get fulltext

Design for Migrant and Seasonal Head Start Survey: Final design report
United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, May 13, 2011
Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.

A discussion of options and suggestions for the design of an ongoing survey of Migrant and Seasonal Head Start programs, staff, families, and children, including considerations for sampling, site outreach, instrumentation, data collection, and data analyses

Methods


get fulltext

Design phase of the National Study of Child Care Supply and Demand (NSCCSD): Feasibility test report
United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, January 31, 2009
Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.

A description of the method used to evaluate the feasibility of the National Study of Child Care Supply and Demand, including an assessment of the study to answer its research questions while remaining within budget constraints

Methods


get fulltext

Design phase of the National Study of Child Care Supply and Demand (NSCCSD): Final recommendations for the center-based provider questionnaire
United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, January 31, 2010
Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.

Recommendations for the improvement of the design and content of a survey instrument for the assessment of the national supply of center-based child care services

Methods


get fulltext

Design phase of the National Study of Child Care Supply and Demand (NSCCSD): Final recommendations for the home-based provider questionnaire
United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, January 31, 2010
Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.

Recommendations for the improvement of the design and content of a survey instrument for the assessment of the national supply of home-based child care services, including comments of changes to the actual survey

Methods


get fulltext

Design phase of the National Study of Child Care Supply and Demand (NSCCSD): Final recommendations for the demand questionnaire
United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, January 31, 2010
Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.

Recommendations for the improvement of the design and content of a survey instrument for the assessment of the parents' demand for child care services across the United States

Methods


get fulltext

Quality in early childhood care and education settings: A compendium of measures
United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, March 2010
(2nd ed.). Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.

Profiles of instruments designed to measure the quality of early care and education settings, including information on instrument program target age and setting, purpose, administration, key constructs and scoring, and reliability and validity

Methods


get fulltext

Design phase of the National Study of Child Care Supply and Demand (NSCCSD): Revised sampling report and addendum
United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, January 31, 2010
Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.

A presentation of alternate designs of sampling methods for achieving a representative number of sample respondents for the assessment of the supply and demand of the national child care market

Methods


get fulltext

Measuring the regional economic importance of early care and education: The Cornell methodology guide
Ribeiro, Rosaria, 2004
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, Department of City and Regional Planning.

A guide to conducting a regional economic analysis of the child care sector

Methods


Market rate study guidebook: A guide to implementing a child care market rate study using child care resource and referral data
Grobe, Deana, 2003
Corvallis: Oregon Child Care Research Partnership.

A guide to conducting state child care market rate surveys using data from child care resource and referral databases

Methods


get fulltext

Guidebook for implementing a study on the dynamics of child care subsidy use
Grobe, Deana, 2003
Corvallis: Oregon Child Care Research Partnership.

A description of the methodology developed in the course of a five-state longitudinal study, based on administrative data from the child care subsidy program, on the dynamics of child care subsidy use--including characteristics of children and families who receive subsidies, services received, length of subsidy receipt spells, probability of reentry into the subsidy system, and stability of children's care arrangements while they are in the subsidy system--designed as a guide to enable states and researchers to conduct similar studies on this topic

Methods


get fulltext

Putting administrative data to work: A toolkit for state agencies on advancing data integration and data sharing efforts to support sound policy and program development
Duran, Frances, 2005
Farmington, CT: Child Health and Development Institute of Connecticut.

An assessment, implementation, and reference guide for state agencies seeking to enhance and strengthen their data and research infrastructures

Methods


get fulltext

Child care & parent productivity: Making the business case
Shellenback, Karen, 2004
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, Department of City and Regional Planning.

An outline of methodology for cost/benefit analyses of work/life initiatives, including employer-provided child care

Methods


Select Citation
[1]  

Search Feedback


 



Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate