Search Results

Produced by Research Connections

Peer Reviewed Journal

Current Search: authors:(CCB) OR publishers:(CCB) OR funders:(CCB) OR authors:(OPRE) OR publishers:(OPRE) OR funders:(OPRE)
Current Filters: New in last year [remove]; Full Text:yes [remove];

44 results found.

Select Citation

Result

Resource Type

			2012 report: Migrant and Seasonal Head Start Supplement to the National Agricultural Worker Survey United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, March, 2012 (OPRE Report No. 2012-13). Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. Findings on the characteristics of families with children under 6 years old from the National Agricultural Worker Survey (NAWS), a national random sample survey of crop farmworkers, and findings on families' child care experiences from the NAWS Migrant and Seasonal Head Start Supplement, which is administered to NAWS respondents with children under the age of 6	Reports & Papers
			Can we trust parental reports of child care subsidy receipt? United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, December, 2012 (Methodological Brief OPRE 2012-53). Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. A study of the incidence and implications of measurement error in parental reports of child care subsidy receipt in survey data, based on parent and provider reports of subsidy receipt from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study, a national longitudinal cohort study	Reports & Papers
			Validation of quality rating and improvement systems for early care and education and school-age care United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, April, 2012 (Research-to-Policy, Research-to-Practice Brief OPRE2012-29). Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. A discussion of considerations to ensure that program quality standards and measurement strategies in child care quality rating and improvement systems produce accurate and meaningful ratings	Other
			Studying child care subsidies with secondary data sources: CCPRC subsidy workgroup methodology research brief series United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, December, 2012 (Methodological Brief OPRE 2012-54). Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. A discussion of the features of four large-scale data sets relevant to the study of child care subsidies	Methods
			The CCDF policies database book of tables: Key cross-state variations in CCDF policies as of October 1, 2011 United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, October, 2012 (OPRE Report 2012-51). Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. A comparison of aspects of Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF)-related policies among the 50 states, District of Columbia, and territories, including: eligibility requirements for families and children; application, redetermination, terms of authorization, and waiting lists; family payments; and policies for providers, including reimbursement rates	Other
			Common challenges in the study of continuity of child care subsidy participation: CCPRC subsidy workgroup methodology research brief series United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, December, 2012 (Methodological Brief OPRE 2012-55). Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. A discussion of issues in designing studies of the dynamics of child care subsidy receipt	Methods
			Child outcomes and classroom quality in FACES 2009 United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, September, 2012 (OPRE Report 2012-37a). Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. A profile of the characteristics of Head Start children and families and their home and Head Start classroom environments in fall 2009 and spring 2010, including children's cognitive, physical, and socioemotional development, and Head Start classroom curricula, activities, and quality, based on fall 2009 and spring 2010 data for a sample of 370 classrooms and 3,022 children in the Head Start Family and Child Experiences Survey (FACES)	Reports & Papers
			Data tables for Child outcomes and classroom quality in FACES 2009 report United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, September, 2012 (OPRE Report 2012-37b). Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. Data tables from a profile of the characteristics of Head Start children and families and their home and Head Start classroom environments in fall 2009 and spring 2010, including children's cognitive, physical, and socioemotional development, and Head Start classroom curricula, activities, and quality, based on fall 2009 and spring 2010 data for a sample of 370 classrooms and 3,022 children in the Head Start Family and Child Experiences Survey (FACES)	Other
			Child outcomes and classroom quality in FACES 2009 [Executive summary] United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, September, 2012 (OPRE Report 2012-37a). Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. A summary of a profile of the characteristics of Head Start children and families and their home and Head Start classroom environments in fall 2009 and spring 2010, including children's cognitive, physical, and socioemotional development, and Head Start classroom curricula, activities, and quality, based on fall 2009 and spring 2010 data for a sample of 370 classrooms and 3,022 children in the Head Start Family and Child Experiences Survey (FACES)	Executive Summary
			Understanding and choosing assessments and developmental screeners for young children ages 3-5: Profiles of selected measures: Final report United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, June, 2011 (OPRE Report No. 2011-23). Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. A compendium of assessments and developmental screeners for preschool-age children, with profiles of their characteristics, reliability, and validity	Methods
			Third Grade Follow-Up to the Head Start Impact Study: Final report United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, October, 2012 (OPRE Report 2012-45). Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. A longitudinal study through the end of third grade of the effects of Head Start participation on parenting practices and on children's cognitive development, socioemotional development, and health, based on data collected for 4,667 randomly-assigned Head Start applicants from a nationally representative sample of 84 Head Start grantees	Reports & Papers
			Third Grade Follow-Up to the Head Start Impact Study: Final report [Executive summary] United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, October, 2012 (OPRE Report 2012-45b). Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. A summary of a longitudinal study through the end of third grade of the effects of Head Start participation on parenting practices and on children's cognitive development, socioemotional development, and health, based on data collected for 4,667 randomly-assigned Head Start applicants from a nationally representative sample of 84 Head Start grantees	Executive Summary
			Family-provider relationship quality: Review of existing measures of family-provider relationships United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, November, 2012 (OPRE Report No. 2012-47). Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. A review of instruments that measure the quality of family-provider relationships, and a discussion of considerations for the future development of family-provider relationship quality measures	Methods
			Family-provider relationship quality: Review of conceptual and empirical literature of family-provider relationships United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, November, 2012 (OPRE Report No. 2012-46). Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. A review of literature that conceptualizes relationships between families and early care and education providers and that identifies factors associated with high-quality family-provider relationships	Other
			National Survey of Early Care & Education: Home-Based Provider Questionnaire (Rev. ed.) National Opinion Research Center, 28 November, 2011 Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.	Instruments
			National Survey of Early Care & Education: Household Screener (Rev. ed.) National Opinion Research Center, 28 November, 2011 Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.	Instruments
			National Survey of Early Care & Education: Household Questionnaire (Rev. ed.) National Opinion Research Center, 28 November, 2011 Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.	Instruments
			National Survey of Early Care & Education: Center-Based Provider Questionnaire (Rev. ed.) National Opinion Research Center, 28 November, 2011 Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.	Instruments
			National Survey of Early Care & Education: Center-Based Provider Screener (Rev. ed.) National Opinion Research Center, 28 November, 2011 Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.	Instruments
			National Survey of Early Care & Education: Workforce [Classroom Staff] Questionnaire (Rev. ed.) National Opinion Research Center, 28 November, 2011 Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation.	Instruments
			On-site approaches to quality improvement in quality rating and improvement systems: Building on the research on coaching United States. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, November, 2012 (Research-to-Policy, Research-to-Practice Brief OPRE2012-40). Washington, DC: U.S. Administration for Children and Families, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation. An examination of research on coaching, as well as other on-site quality improvement strategies, in child care quality rating and improvement systems	Other
			Approaches to assessing the language and literacy skills of young dual language learners: A review of the research Aikens, Nikki, 2012 (Research Brief No. 10). Chapel Hill, NC: Center for Early Care and Education Research: Dual Language Learners. A summary of a review of the procedures used to assess the language and literacy development of young dual language learners, based on 80 studies from Canada and the United States	Fact Sheets & Briefs
			Assessment tools for language and literacy development of young dual language learners (DLLs) Atkins-Burnett, Sally, 2012 (Research Brief No. 9). Chapel Hill, NC: Center for Early Care and Education Research: Dual Language Learners. A summary of a review of the reliability and validity of measures used to assess the language and literacy development of young dual language learners, based on 7 large-scale government studies and 30 research studies from Canada and the United States	Fact Sheets & Briefs
			Improving family engagement: The organizational context and its influence on partnering with parents in formal child care settings Douglass, Anne, Fall 2011 Early Childhood Research & Practice, 13(2) A comparison of the quality of family engagement in early childhood education centers with either relational or conventional bureaucratic organizational structures, based on data collected from 4 centers involved in the Strengthening Families initiative	Reports & Papers
			Getting into the black box: How do low-income parents make choices about early care and education in Maryland? Forry, Nicole D., November, 2012 (Publication No. 2012-42). Washington, DC: Child Trends. A study of low income parents' perceptions of high-quality child care, their priorities in choosing child care arrangements, and their child care decision-making process, based on four focus groups with 41 parents held in Prince George's County and Baltimore City, Maryland	Reports & Papers

Select Citation

Results 1 - 25

[1] 2

Search Results

Search Feedback