The techno-literacy practices of young children

Author(s): Marsh, Jackie;
Date Issued: 2004
Publisher(s): Sage Publications USA
Description: An examination of the home techno-literacy activities of young British children, comparing the amount of television watching with the rate of literacy activities and their parents' attitudes towards these activities
show entire record ↓
Journal Title: Journal of Early Childhood Research
Volume Number: 2
Issue Number: 1
Page Range: 51-66
Topics: Children & Child Development > Child Development & School Readiness > Early Literacy

International Child Care & Early Education > Single-Country Studies

Parents & Families > Involvement In Child Care & Early Education > Parent-Child
Country: England, United Kingdom
ISSN: 1476-718X Paper
1741-2927 Online
Peer Reviewed: yes
hide record ↑


More Like This

what is this? These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.

Parents' reports of the school readiness of young children from the National Household Education Surveys Program of 2007: First look Reports & Papers
A comparison of the literacy development context of United States and Japanese families Reports & Papers
Is exposure to media intended for preschool children associated with less parent-child shared reading aloud and teaching activities? Reports & Papers
Television impact on children's vocabulary knowledge: A meta-analysis Fact Sheets & Briefs
Shared reading interactions between mothers and pre-school children: Case studies of three dyads from a disadvantaged community Reports & Papers

Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections' Terms of Use.

Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate