Regulatory enforcement styles

Author(s): Gormley, Jr., William T.;
Date Issued: 1998
Publisher(s): University of Utah
Description: A study of child care inspectors and their differing regulatory enforcement styles against the backdrop of individual-level and state-level variations in regulatory stringency, regulatory flexibility, and the technical support supplied by their agencies, based on interviews with 104 child care inspectors in Colorado, North Carolina, Oklahoma, and Pennsylvania
show entire record ↓
Journal Title: Political Research Quarterly
Volume Number: 51
Issue Number: 2
Page Range: 363-383
Topics: Policies > Child Care & Early Education Policies > Licensing & Regulation
Country: United States
States: COLORADO, NORTH CAROLINA, OKLAHOMA, PENNSYLVANIA
ISSN: 1065-9129 Paper
1938-274X Online
Peer Reviewed: yes
hide record ↑


More Like This

what is this? These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.

Regulatory enforcement: Accommodation and conflict in four states Reports & Papers
Beyond parallel play: Emerging state and community planning roles in building early learning systems Reports & Papers
A comparative enforcement study: Survey report of negative enforcement options and practices Reports & Papers
Peer-to-peer discussions: School-age care and licensing and quality standards: Summary of key themes- January 2009 Fact Sheets & Briefs
A systematic approach to child care regulatory review, policy evaluation and planning to promote health and safety of children in child care: A manual for state and local child care and maternal and child health agency staff Other

Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections' Terms of Use.

Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate