Training of early childhood education and care staff

Author(s): Moss, Peter;
Date Issued: 2000
Publisher(s): Elsevier Science (Firm)
Description: A comparative analysis of early education and care staff training, using six countries (Denmark, France, New Zealand, Spain, Sweden, United States) as case studies to explore how training issues relate to the structure of center based child care
show entire record ↓
Journal Title: International Journal of Educational Research
Volume Number: 33
Issue Number: 1
Page Range: 31-53
Topics: International Child Care & Early Education > Cross-National Comparisons

Child Care & Early Education Provider Workforce > Training, Mentoring, & Apprenticeships

Service Delivery > Child Care & Early Education Services
Country: Denmark, Spain, France, New Zealand, Sweden, United States
ISSN: 0883-0355 Paper
0959-4752 Electronic
Peer Reviewed: yes
hide record ↑


More Like This

what is this? These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.

The child care transition: A league table of early childhood education and care in economically advanced countries Other
Maryland as a nation: Comparing Maryland's early childhood system to the systems of other countries: A secondary review of the UNICEF Innocenti Centre's international comparison of OECD early childhood systems Other
Early childhood education and care: An overview of developments in the OECD countries Other
The ''production'' of child care: How labor markets shape social policy and vice versa Reports & Papers
Issues in education for children three to eight in six countries Fact Sheets & Briefs

Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections' Terms of Use.

Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate