Two-generation programs: Design, cost and short-term effectiveness

Author(s): St. Pierre, Robert G.; Layzer, Jean I.; Barnes, Helen V.;
Date Issued: 1995
Publisher(s): David & Lucile Packard Foundation
Description: A description of two-generation programs, using information from a study of six local and government-sponsored two-generation programs from across the United States
show entire record ↓
Journal Title: The Future of Children
Volume Number: 5
Issue Number: 3
Page Range: 76-93
Journal Notes: Retrieved February 1, 2006, from http://www.futureofchildren.org/usr_doc/vol5no3ART4.pdf
Topics: Parent, School, & Community School Readiness/Child School Success & Performance > Parent, School, & Community School Readiness

Parents & Families > Involvement In Child Care & Early Education

Programs, Interventions & Curricula > Programs > Two-Generation Programs
ISSN: 1054-8289 Paper
1550-1558 Online
Peer Reviewed: yes
hide record ↑


More Like This

what is this? These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.

Short-lived gains or enduring benefits?: The long-term impact of full-day kindergarten Fact Sheets & Briefs
The effects of the Peers Early Educational Partnership (PEEP) on children's developmental progress Reports & Papers
The effects of the Peers Early Education Partnership (PEEP) on children's developmental progress Fact Sheets & Briefs
Parenting education: Programs that provide knowledge and skill development for parents of children birth to five years Other
Learning around the clock: Benefits of expanded learning opportunities for older youth [Executive summary] Executive Summary

Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections' Terms of Use.

Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate