Evaluating beginning reading software for at-risk learners

Author(s): Bishop, M.J.; Santoro, Lana Edwards;
Date Issued: 2006
Publisher(s): John Wiley & Sons
Description: A framework based on early reading education and instructional technology to evaluate the design and content of instructional software for improving early reading skills
show entire record ↓
Journal Title: Psychology in the Schools
Volume Number: 43
Issue Number: 1
Page Range: 57-70
Topics: Programs, Interventions & Curricula > Interventions/Curricula > Early Literacy
ISSN: 0033-3085 Paper
1520-6807 Electronic
Peer Reviewed: yes
hide record ↑


More Like This

what is this? These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.

Selecting software with caution: An empirical evaluation of popular beginning reading software for children with early literacy difficulties Reports & Papers
Assessing the content and quality of commercially available reading software programs: Do they have the fundamental structures to promote the development of early reading skills in children Reports & Papers
Developing tools for assessing and using commercially available reading software programs to promote the development of early reading skills in children Other
Impact of an Early Reading First program on the language and literacy achievement of children from diverse language backgrounds Reports & Papers
Reading First: States report improvements in reading instruction, but additional procedures would clarify Education's role in ensuring proper implementation by states Reports & Papers

Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections' Terms of Use.

Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate