Concurrent and predictive validity of the Phelps Kindergarten Readiness Scale-II

Author(s): Duncan, Jennifer; Rafter, Erin M.;
Date Issued: 2005
Publisher(s): John Wiley & Sons
Description: A study of the concurrent and predictive validity of the Phelps Kindergarten Readiness Scale, Second Edition (PKRS-II) in a sample of 74 kindergarten students as a screening tool for possible learning difficulties
show entire record ↓
Journal Title: Psychology in the Schools
Volume Number: 42
Issue Number: 4
Page Range: 355-359
Topics: Children & Child Development > Special Needs Children & Special Child Populations > Special Needs

Research & Evaluation Methods > Measures
Country: United States
States: NEW YORK
ISSN: 0033-3085 Paper
1520-6807 Electronic
Peer Reviewed: yes
hide record ↑

Related Resources

what is this? Related Resources include summaries, versions, or components of the currently selected resource, documents encompassing or employing it, or datasets/measures used in its creation.

Woodcock-Johnson III Instruments


More Like This

what is this? These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.

The predictive utility of kindergarten screening for math difficulty Reports & Papers
Mental health screening of preschool children: Validity and reliability of ABLE Reports & Papers
Profiles of emergent literacy skills among preschool children who are at risk for academic difficulties Reports & Papers
Early identification of learning problems: A meta-analysis Reports & Papers
ABLE: A system for mental health screening and care for preschool children Other

Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections' Terms of Use.

Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate