Exploring differences in year-round and traditional calendar Even Start projects

Author(s): McCarthy, Maria; Noonan, Mary; Gamse, Beth;
Date Issued: 1998
Publisher(s): Abt Associates
Description: A comparison of the characteristics and participant outcomes between year-round and standard 10-month-long Even Start Family Literacy Programs, focusing on differences in program size, staffing patterns, and types and amounts of services offered, based on a sample of 453 Even Start projects for the 1995-1996 program year
show entire record ↓
Source: Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates. Retrieved February 3, 2006, from http://www.abtassociates.com/reports/D19980433.pdf
Topics: Programs, Interventions & Curricula > Programs > Two-Generation Programs

Programs, Interventions & Curricula > Interventions/Curricula > Early Literacy
Country: United States
hide record ↑

Related Resources

what is this? Related Resources include summaries, versions, or components of the currently selected resource, documents encompassing or employing it, or datasets/measures used in its creation.

Exploring differences in year-round and traditional calendar Even Start projects: Executive summary Executive Summary


More Like This

what is this? These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.

Analysis of Federal Even Start expenditures and selected comparisons Other
Analysis of Federal Even Start expenditures and selected comparisons: Executive summary Executive Summary
Improving family literacy: Findings from the National Even Start Evaluation Reports & Papers
Even Start: Evidence from the past and a look to the future Other
Minnesota Even Start and family literacy: 2002-03 evaluation report Reports & Papers

Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections' Terms of Use.

Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate