Quality child care and socio-emotional risk factors: No evidence of diminishing returns for urban children

Author(s): Montes, Guillermo; Hightower, A. Dirk; Brugger, Lauri; Moustafa, Eman;
Date Issued: 2005
Publisher(s): Elsevier Science (Firm)
Description: An investigation testing the hypothesis that early childhood centers experience diminishing returns from quality improvements as the quality of the classroom rises with regards to concurrent socio-emotional outcomes
show entire record ↓

Related Resources

what is this? Related Resources include summaries, versions, or components of the currently selected resource, documents encompassing or employing it, or datasets/measures used in its creation.

Teacher-Child Rating Scale Instruments
Early Childhood Environment Rating Scale (Rev. ed.) Instruments


More Like This

what is this? These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.

Social-emotional classroom climate in child care, child-teacher relationships and children's second grade peer relations Reports & Papers
The social and behavioral ecology of mixed-age and same-age preschool classrooms: A natural experiment Reports & Papers
Trajectories of classroom externalizing behavior: Contributions of child characteristics, family characteristics, and the teacher-child relationship during the school transition Reports & Papers
The import of the cortisol rise in child care differs as a function of behavioral inhibition Reports & Papers
An investigation of preschool classroom behavioral adjustment problems and social-emotional school readiness competence Reports & Papers

Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections' Terms of Use.

Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate