The National Post and the nanny state: Framing the child care debate in Canada

Author(s): Theriault, Luc
Date Issued: 2005
Description: A rebuttal to a series of articles written in the Canadian newspaper, National Post, entitled The Nanny State, which argued against the proposed National Child Care Program
show entire record ↓
Source: Paper presented at the 12th biennial Canadian Social Welfare Policy Conference, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada. Retrieved July 27, 2005, from http://www.ccsd.ca/cswp/2005/theriault.pdf (no longer accessible since February 9, 2006)
Topics: International Child Care & Early Education > Single-Country Studies

Policies

Service Delivery > Child Care & Early Education Services
Country: United States
hide record ↑


More Like This

what is this? These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.

A matter of choice: A critical discourse analysis of ECEC policy in Canada's 2006 federal election Reports & Papers
Expansion of the entitlement to free education for disadvantaged two-year-olds Other
The mother-citizen and the working girl: First-wave feminist citizenship claims in Canada and discursive opportunities for twenty-first century childcare policy Other
Survey of Canadian Attitudes Toward Learning: Early childhood learning Fact Sheets & Briefs
Toward a provincial framework for early learning and care in Alberta: Integrating child care and early education: A central theme in early learning and care Other

Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections' Terms of Use.

Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate