The costs and benefits of universal preschool in California

Author(s): Rand Corporation;
Date Issued: 2005
Publisher(s): Rand Corporation
Description: A brief discussing the potential costs and benefits of implementing a high quality universal preschool program in California.
show entire record ↓
Funder(s): David & Lucile Packard Foundation
Source: (RB-9118-PF). Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation. Retrieved April 13, 2005, from http://www.rand.org/publications/RB/RB9118/RAND_RB9118.pdf
Topics: Child Care & Early Education Market > Economic & Societal Impact > Cost Benefit Analysis

Programs, Interventions & Curricula > Programs > Preschool

Policies > Child Care & Early Education Policies > Universal Provision
Country: United States
hide record ↑

Related Resources

what is this? Related Resources include summaries, versions, or components of the currently selected resource, documents encompassing or employing it, or datasets/measures used in its creation.

The economics of investing in universal preschool education in California Reports & Papers


More Like This

what is this? These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.

The economics of investing in universal preschool education in California: Executive summary Executive Summary
Should Ohio invest in universal preschooling? Other
The fiscal impacts of universal pre-k: Case study analysis for three states Reports & Papers
County-level estimates of the effects of a universal preschool program in California Reports & Papers
California's preschool for all act (Proposition 82): A policy analysis Fact Sheets & Briefs

Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections' Terms of Use.

Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate