Defining program quality

Author(s): Cryer, Debby;
Date Issued: 2003
Publisher(s): Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
Description: An examination of two different conceptions of quality within early childhood education and care (ECEC): process quality and structural quality
show entire record ↓
Source: In D. Cryer & R.M. Clifford (Eds.), Early childhood and care in the USA (pp. 31-46). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
Topics: Child Care & Early Education Quality > Process Quality

Child Care & Early Education Quality > Structural Quality

Policies > Child Care & Early Education Policies
ISBN: 1-55766-638-5 : Unspecified
hide record ↑

Related Resources

what is this? Related Resources include summaries, versions, or components of the currently selected resource, documents encompassing or employing it, or datasets/measures used in its creation.

Early childhood education and care in the USA Other


More Like This

what is this? These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.

Revisiting the two faces of child care quality: Structure and process Reports & Papers
An economic analysis of the proposed ECEC national quality agenda Reports & Papers
Beyond quality in early childhood education and care: Languages of evaluation Other
Program quality characteristics in segregated and inclusive early childhood settings Reports & Papers
The most important messages in White paper no 41 (2008-2009): Quality in ECEC Fact Sheets & Briefs

Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections' Terms of Use.

Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate