Creating dedicated local revenue sources for out-of-school time initiatives

Author(s): Langford, Barbara;
Date Issued: 1999
Publisher(s): Finance Project (U.S.)
Description: An informational brief discussing the advantages and disadvantages of financing strategies used to create dedicated revenue sources for after school programs; the strategies include: special taxing districts, special tax levies; guaranteed expenditure minimums; children's trust funds; fees and narrowly-based taxes, and income tax check-offs
show entire record ↓
Funder(s): DeWitt Wallace-Reader's Digest Fund
Source: Strategy Brief, 1(1). Retrieved March 9, 2006, from http://www.financeproject.org/Publications/Brief1.pdf (no longer accessible since April 7, 2008)
Topics: Programs, Interventions & Curricula > Programs > Out-Of-School Time

Financing & Funding > Funding Mechanisms
Country: United States
hide record ↑


More Like This

what is this? These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.

Adapting to changing conditions: Accessing state tobacco settlement revenues for out-of-school time and community school initiatives Fact Sheets & Briefs
Financing facility improvements for out-of-school time and community school programs Fact Sheets & Briefs
Finding funding: A guide to federal sources for out-of-school-time and community school initiatives Other
21st Century Community Learning Centers: Providing afterschool supports to communities nationwide Fact Sheets & Briefs
Using NCLB funds to support extended learning time: Opportunities for afterschool programs: Strategy brief Other

Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections' Terms of Use.

Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate