Follow-up review: The Resource Coordination Program: Program's elimination provided funds for Pre-K slots in FY2012

Author(s): Georgia. Department of Audits and Accounts. Performance Audit Operations Division;
Date Issued: August, 2011
Publisher(s): Georgia. Department of Audits and Accounts. Performance Audit Operations Division
Description: A follow-up to a study of services provided through the Resource Coordination Program, a component of the Georgia state prekindergarten program that awards funds for support services to prekindergarten providers
show entire record ↓
Source: (Follow-Up Review 11-11). Atlanta: Georgia, Department of Audits and Accounts, Performance Audit Operations Division. Retrieved April 23, 2012, from http://www.audits.ga.gov/rsaAudits/download/12910
Topics: Programs, Interventions & Curricula > Programs > Public Prekindergarten
Country: United States
hide record ↑

Related Resources

what is this? Related Resources include summaries, versions, or components of the currently selected resource, documents encompassing or employing it, or datasets/measures used in its creation.

The Resource Coordination Program: The program's impact on kindergarten readiness is unknown Reports & Papers


More Like This

what is this? These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.

Pre-k initiatives in five states Fact Sheets & Briefs
State pre-k funding: 2012-13 school year Fact Sheets & Briefs
The promise of pre-K Other
Head Start & Georgia Pre-K Fact Sheets & Briefs
Impact of Georgia's pre-k program on kindergarten through third grade teachers Reports & Papers

Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections' Terms of Use.

Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate