The cognitive/academic emphasis versus the whole child approach: The 50-year debate

Resource Type: Other
Author(s): Bishop-Josef, Sandra J.; Zigler, Edward F.;
Date Issued: 2011
Publisher(s): Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
Description: An account of the alternating external pressures for a focus on either academic skills or broader child development goals throughout the history of Head Start
show entire record ↓
Editor(s): Zigler, Edward F.; Gilliam, Walter S.; Barnett, W. Steven
Source: In E.F. Zigler, W.S. Gilliam, & W.S. Barnett (Eds.), The pre-k debates: Current controversies and issues (pp. 83-88). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes
Topics: Programs, Interventions & Curricula > Programs > Early Head Start/Head Start
ISBN: 1598571834 : Paperback , 978-1598571837 : Paperback
hide record ↑

Related Resources

what is this? Related Resources include summaries, versions, or components of the currently selected resource, documents encompassing or employing it, or datasets/measures used in its creation.

The pre-k debates: Current controversies and issues Other


More Like This

what is this? These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.

Three steps forward, two steps back: Head Start and the measurement of social competence Reports & Papers
A comprehensive approach to technology training for early childhood teachers Reports & Papers
Do federal compensatory education programs really work?: A brief historical analysis of Title I and Head Start Reports & Papers
School readiness in children living in non-parental care: Impacts of Head Start Reports & Papers
Prepared statement of Charlie Mills, III Other

Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections' Terms of Use.

Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate