Literature review: Governance of integrated early care and learning systems

Author(s): Findlay, Tammy;
Date Issued: June, 2010
Publisher(s): Coalition of Child Care Advocates of British Columbia; Early Childhood Educators of British Columbia
Description: An overview of approaches to early care and learning system governance in New Jersey, Australia, New Zealand, South Korea, Venezuela, and Reggio Emilia, Italy
show entire record ↓
Source: Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Coalition of Child Care Advocates of British Columbia. Retrieved January 30, 2012, from http://www.cccabc.bc.ca/cccabcdocs/integrated/files/IECL_Lit_Review_2010.pdf
Topics: International Child Care & Early Education > Cross-National Comparisons

Policies > Child Care & Early Education Policies
hide record ↑


More Like This

what is this? These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.

The struggle for early childhood curricula: A comparison of the English Foundation Stage Curriculum, Te Whariki and Reggio Emilia Reports & Papers
Starting strong: Curricula and pedagogies in early childhood education and care: Five curriculum outlines Other
International perspectives on quality in mixed economies of child care Other
Maryland as a nation: Comparing Maryland's early childhood system to the systems of other countries: A secondary review of the UNICEF Innocenti Centre's international comparison of OECD early childhood systems Other
Quality matters in early childhood education and care: Korea 2012 [Executive summary] Executive Summary

Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections' Terms of Use.

Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate