Confounded statistical analyses hinder interpretation of the NELP report

Author(s): Paris, Scott G.; Luo, Serena Wenshu
Date Issued: May, 2010
Description: Critiques of the methodology choices, statistical techniques, and generalizability of the findings of the National Early Literacy Panel report
show entire record ↓
Journal Title: Educational Researcher
Volume Number: 39
Issue Number: 4
Page Range: 316-322
Topics: Children & Child Development > Child Development & School Readiness > Early Literacy

Research & Evaluation Methods
ISSN: 0013-189X Paper
Peer Reviewed: yes
hide record ↑

Related Resources

what is this? Related Resources include summaries, versions, or components of the currently selected resource, documents encompassing or employing it, or datasets/measures used in its creation.

Special issue: The National Early Literacy Panel Report: Summary, commentary, and reflections on policies and practices to improve children's early literacy Other


More Like This

what is this? These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.

Misunderstood statistical assumptions undermine criticism of the National Early Literacy Panel's report Other
Advancing early literacy learning for all children: Implications of the NELP report for dual-language learners Other
The NELP report on shared story reading interventions (Chapter 4): Extending the story Other
Recognizing different kinds of "head starts" Other
Speaking out for language: Why language is central to reading development Other

Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections' Terms of Use.

Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate