Process evaluation: Power of the Wind pilot project: A six state partnership to engage youth with wind energy

Author(s): Nippolt, Pamela L.; Nelson, Amy G.;
Date Issued: October, 2010
Publisher(s): University of Minnesota. Extension Service
Description: A process evaluation of the pilot of Power of the Wind, a 4-H curriculum for middle school children, that examines a train-the-trainer implementation model, youth interest and engagement, and connections across pilot sites
show entire record ↓
Funder(s): 3M Foundation
Source: St. Paul: University of Minnesota, Extension Service. Retrieved November 3, 2011, from http://www1.extension.umn.edu/youth/docs/Power-of-the-Wind-Process-Eval.pdf
Topics: Programs, Interventions & Curricula > Programs > Out-Of-School Time

Programs, Interventions & Curricula > Interventions/Curricula > School Age
Country: United States
States: IOWA, MINNESOTA, MISSOURI, SOUTH DAKOTA, TEXAS, WISCONSIN
hide record ↑


More Like This

what is this? These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.

Reducing the risk of sudden infant death syndrome in child care and changing provider practices: Lessons learned from a demonstration project Reports & Papers
New faces, new places: A 4-H science learning program in urban out-of-school settings Reports & Papers
The Minnesota 4-H Quality Improvement Study Fact Sheets & Briefs
Afterschool advantage: Powerful new learning opportunities Other
Evaluating the 4-H Science initiative: Early findings and recommendations Fact Sheets & Briefs

Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections' Terms of Use.

Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate