Gender equality revisited: Changes in Nordic childcare policies in the 2000s

Author(s): Eydal, Gudny Bjork; Rostgaard, Tine;
Date Issued: April, 2011
Description: A national comparison and account of the evolution of governmental child care support for parents in the in the decade of the 2000s in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden, including discussions of both the changing paternal leave options and the addition of the maternal cash-for-care allowance option to the existing universal publicly-subsidized child care
show entire record ↓
Funder(s): Nordic Council
Journal Title: Social Policy & Administration
Volume Number: 45
Issue Number: 2
Page Range: 161-179
Topics: International Child Care & Early Education > Cross-National Comparisons

Policies
ISSN: 0144-5596 Paper
Peer Reviewed: yes
hide record ↑


More Like This

what is this? These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.

[Review of the book Early childhood education in five Nordic countries] Book Reviews
The Nordic child care regime: History, development and challenges Other
Towards a Scandinavian childcare system for 0-12 year olds in Ireland? Fact Sheets & Briefs
Maternity leave and payment for childcare, impact on the economic situation of a married couple in Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland, Great Britain, and Germany Reports & Papers
Incentives to work?: The impact of a 'Cash-for-Care' benefit for immigrant and native mothers labour market participation Reports & Papers

Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections' Terms of Use.

Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate