Third International Mathematics and Science Study: International Curriculum Analysis, 1992-1995
||The International Curriculum Analysis (ICA) study provided curricular and textbook information from each country participating in the Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). TIMSS was a comparative study of education in mathematics and the sciences conducted in over 40 countries on five continents. The goal of TIMSS was to measure student achievement in mathematics and science in participating countries and to assess some of the curricular and classroom factors that are related to student learning in these subjects. The study was intended to provide educators and policy makers with an unparalleled and multidimensional perspective on mathematics and science curricula; their implementation; the nature of student performance in mathematics and science; and the social, economic, and educational context in which these occur.
show entire record ↓
||Schmidt, William. Third International Mathematics and Science Study: International Curriculum Analysis, 1992-1995 [Computer file]. ICPSR30601-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2011-03-07. doi:10.3886/ICPSR30601
||The international curriculum analysis was conducted in each country under the direction of the TIMSS National Research Coordinator (NRC) and the national research center in coordination with the United States TIMSS National Research Center. Materials were collected from each country that reflected those used by the majority of the students in each population. The initial population of students were 9 years of age.
|Date of Collection:
More Like This
These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.
Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections
Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and
Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do
not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and
© 2013 The Regents of the University of Michigan