Educated, employed and equal: The economic prosperity case for national child care

Author(s): Young Women's Christian Association of Canada;
Date Issued: 07 March, 2011
Publisher(s): Young Women's Christian Association of Canada
Description: Arguments for a national child care agenda in Canada, premised on both women's increased workforce participation and a cost-benefit analysis of the universal provision of child care services
show entire record ↓
Source: Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Young Women's Christian Association of Canada. Retrieved March 14, 2011, from http://ywcacanada.ca/data/publications/00000047.pdf
Topics: International Child Care & Early Education > Single-Country Studies

Child Care & Early Education Market > Economic & Societal Impact > Cost Benefit Analysis

Policies > Child Care & Early Education Policies > Universal Provision
hide record ↑

Related Resources

what is this? Related Resources include summaries, versions, or components of the currently selected resource, documents encompassing or employing it, or datasets/measures used in its creation.

Educated, employed and equal: The economic prosperity case for national child care [Executive summary] Executive Summary


More Like This

what is this? These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.

Universal childcare provision in the UK: Towards a cost-benefit analysis Reports & Papers
The fiscal impacts of universal pre-k: Case study analysis for three states Reports & Papers
Quality preschool helps parents work and children learn Fact Sheets & Briefs
Costs and benefits of universal childcare: A preliminary economic analysis for the UK Reports & Papers
Early childhood education: How important are the cost-savings to the school system? Reports & Papers

Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections' Terms of Use.

Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate