Making quality count: Lessons from the Ready by 21 Quality Counts initiative

Author(s): Yohalem, Nicole; Bertoletti, Joe; Ravindranath, Nalini;
Date Issued: October, 2010
Publisher(s): Forum for Youth Investment
Description: A description of the Ready by 21 Quality Counts initiative, a systems-building model for the improvement of the quality and capacity of out of school time programming, based on information from the implementation of the model at 7 community sites and 6 state sites
show entire record ↓
Source: Washington, DC: Forum for Youth Investment. Retrieved December 14, 2010, from http://www.forumforyouthinvestment.org/files/QC%20Lessons%20Learned%20Final_2_0.pdf
Topics: Service Delivery > Coordination & Integration Of Child Care & Early Education Services
Country: United States
States: CALIFORNIA, IOWA, INDIANA, KENTUCKY, MICHIGAN, MISSOURI, NEW YORK, OKLAHOMA, RHODE ISLAND, TENNESSEE, TEXAS, WASHINGTON
hide record ↑


More Like This

what is this? These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.

Lessons learned from 10 years of changing the face of science Fact Sheets & Briefs
A multi-dimensional policy analysis of Texas Senate Bill 50: The need to build the capacity of Texas’s uncoupled system of early childhood education and development Other
The Build Initiative: Building early learning systems in the states: A report on the fifth year Other
The challenge of system-building in the after-school field: Lessons from experience Other
Lessons in early learning: Building an integrated pre-k-12 system in Montgomery County Public Schools Reports & Papers

Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections' Terms of Use.

Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate