Misunderstood statistical assumptions undermine criticism of the National Early Literacy Panel's report

Author(s): Schatschneider, Christopher; Lonigan, Christopher J.
Date Issued: May, 2010
Description: A response to methodological and statistical criticism by two authors of the Developing Early Literacy report by the National Early Literacy Panel
show entire record ↓
Journal Title: Educational Researcher
Volume Number: 39
Issue Number: 4
Page Range: 347-351
Topics: Children & Child Development > Child Development & School Readiness > Early Literacy

Research & Evaluation Methods > Research Methods

Research & Evaluation Methods > Measures
ISSN: 0013-189X Paper
Peer Reviewed: yes
hide record ↑

Related Resources

what is this? Related Resources include summaries, versions, or components of the currently selected resource, documents encompassing or employing it, or datasets/measures used in its creation.

Special issue: The National Early Literacy Panel Report: Summary, commentary, and reflections on policies and practices to improve children's early literacy Other
National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups Literature Review


More Like This

what is this? These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.

Confounded statistical analyses hinder interpretation of the NELP report Other
Introduction and methodology Other
Synthesis of scientific research on development of early literacy in young children Other
The misunderstood giant: On the predictive role of early vocabulary to future reading Reports & Papers
Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's Meta-Analysis Literature Review

Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections' Terms of Use.

Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate