Evaluation: Practical applications for closing achievement gaps

Author(s): Kimmel, Susan J.; Griffith, Priscilla L.;
Date Issued: 2010
Publisher(s): Guilford Press
Description: A discussion of both formative and summative evaluation, methods to collect and interpret data, and suggestions for collaboration to use the results to improve Early Reading First programs
show entire record ↓
Editor(s): McKenna, Michael C.; Walpole, Sharon; Conradi, Kristin
Source: In Promoting early reading: Research, resources, and best practices (pp. 142-163). New York: The Guilford Press
Topics: Research & Evaluation Methods

Programs, Interventions & Curricula > Interventions/Curricula > Early Literacy
ISBN: 9781606236864 : Hardcover , 9781606236802 : Paperback
hide record ↑

Related Resources

what is this? Related Resources include summaries, versions, or components of the currently selected resource, documents encompassing or employing it, or datasets/measures used in its creation.

Promoting early reading: Research, resources, and best practices Other


More Like This

what is this? These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.

Reading First Impact Study: Interim report Reports & Papers
Reading First Impact Study: Interim report: Executive summary Executive Summary
Reading First impact study: Final report Reports & Papers
Reading First: States report improvements in reading instruction, but additional procedures would clarify Education's role in ensuring proper implementation by states Reports & Papers
Reading First Implementation Evaluation: Interim report Reports & Papers

Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections' Terms of Use.

Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate