The impact of market forces on child care provision: Insights from the 2005 Child Care Act in the Netherlands

Author(s): Noally, Joelle; Visser, Sabine
Date Issued: July 2009
Description: A comparison of the supply of child care in the Netherlands in 1999-2001 and after the introduction of the 2005 Child Care Act and an analysis of changes in the provision of child care by not-for-profit and for-profit child care providers over the same time period from the General Firm Registry on the location and legal status of child care facilities
show entire record ↓
Journal Title: Journal of Social Policy
Volume Number: 38
Issue Number: 3
Page Range: 477-498
Topics: International Child Care & Early Education > Single-Country Studies

Child Care & Early Education Market

Policies > Child Care & Early Education Policies
Country: Netherlands
ISSN: 0047-2794 Paper
Peer Reviewed: yes
hide record ↑


More Like This

what is this? These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.

Childcare center directors' perceptions of their work environment: A comparison of for-profit and non-profit programs Reports & Papers
Childcare markets: Do they work? Other
The characteristics and training needs of school-age care programs in the larger metro Atlanta area [Executive summary] Executive Summary
The effects of property rights on labor costs of nonprofit firms: An application to the day care industry Reports & Papers
The consequences of implementing a child care voucher scheme: Evidence from Australia, the Netherlands and the USA Reports & Papers

Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections' Terms of Use.

Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate