Perspectives on early childhood systems: Highlights from interviews of key stakeholders in Washington State

Author(s): Organizational Research Services;
Date Issued: January 2009
Publisher(s): Build Initiative; Washington Early Childhood Comprehensive Systems Initiative
Description: An exploration of key stakeholders’ perspectives on early childhood systems building, including the Build Initiative and the Early Childhood Comprehensive Systems Initiative (ECCS) in Washington State, based on interviews with 12 stakeholders on their roles and the perceived strengths and opportunities facing the state in future systems building efforts
show entire record ↓
Source: Cross Lanes, WV: Build Initiative. Retrieved January 13, 2010, from the Foundation for Early Learning Web site: http://www.earlylearning.org/resources/publications/kids-matter/ECCS-%20Build%20Interviews%20Summary%20FINAL%201-20-2009.pdf
Topics: Policies > Coordination & Integration
Country: United States
States: WASHINGTON
hide record ↑


More Like This

what is this? These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.

Building bridges: A comprehensive system for healthy development and school readiness Reports & Papers
Early childhood systems building from a community perspective Fact Sheets & Briefs
The first seven years: The BUILD initiative and early childhood systems development, 2002 to 2009 Other
The Build Initiative: Building early learning systems in the states: A report on the fifth year Other
The Build Initiative: Building early learning systems in the states: A report on the fourth year Reports & Papers

Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections' Terms of Use.

Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate