Child care, women's labour market participation and labour market policy effectiveness in Canada

Author(s): White, Linda A.;
Date Issued: 2001
Publisher(s): University of Toronto Press
Description: An analysis of the effects of labor and child care policies on women's labor force participation in Canada
show entire record ↓
Funder(s): Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Journal Title: Canadian Public Policy
Volume Number: 27
Issue Number: 4
Page Range: 385-405
Journal Notes: Retrieved July 5, 2005, from http://economics.ca/cgi/jab?journal=cpp&view=v27n4/CPPv27n4p385.pdf
Topics: International Child Care & Early Education > Single-Country Studies

Child Care & Early Education Market > Economic & Societal Impact > Economic Impact

Policies
ISSN: 0317-0861 Paper
Peer Reviewed: yes
hide record ↑


More Like This

what is this? These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.

Impact of Quebec's universal low-fee childcare program on female labour force participation, domestic income, and government budgets Reports & Papers
Impact of Quebec's universal low fee childcare program on female labour force participation, domestic income, and government budgets Reports & Papers
Women and the labour market: Recent trends and policy issues Reports & Papers
Short-term impact analysis of an expansion of regulated early learning and care in Nova Scotia Reports & Papers
The causality between female labour force participation and the availability of childcare Reports & Papers

Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections' Terms of Use.

Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate