Early childhood development in Cape Verde and Guinea

Author(s): World Bank;
Date Issued: February 2002
Publisher(s): World Bank
Description: A comparison of early childhood program characteristics and enrollment in the relatively wealthy country Cape Verde and the poorer country of Guinea and the influence of such programs on children’s development, based on a samples of 36 preschools and 900 children from Guinea and 34 preschools and 850 children in Cape Verde
show entire record ↓
Source: (Report No. 23568). Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved August 11, 2009, from http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2002/03/15/000094946_02030604012045/Rendered/PDF/multi0page.pdf
Topics: Children & Child Development > Child Development & School Readiness

International Child Care & Early Education > Cross-National Comparisons

Programs, Interventions & Curricula > Programs
Country: Cape Verde Islands, Guinea
hide record ↑


More Like This

what is this? These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.

Early childhood programs in other nations: Goals and outcomes Other
Preschool achievement in Finland and Estonia: Cross-cultural comparison between the cities of Helsinki and Tallinn Reports & Papers
The frequency of outdoor play for preschool age children cared for at home-based child care settings Reports & Papers
Globalization and its discontents: Early childhood education in a new world order Other
Preschoolers' understanding of knowing-that and knowing-how in the United States and Hong Kong Reports & Papers

Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections' Terms of Use.

Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate