Comparison of accredited and non-accredited family child care programs on program quality, provider professionalism, and family support

Author(s): Smith, Anita Payne
Date Issued: 1996
Description: A 1996 examination of the differences between accredited and non-accredited family-based child care programs in program quality, job professionalism, spousal support, and family functioning through analysis of the Family Day Care Assessment Profile and questionnaire results obtained from 39 registered Georgia family child care providers
show entire record ↓
Journal Title: Child & Youth Care Forum
Volume Number: 25
Issue Number: 6
Page Range: 353-378
Topics: Child Care & Early Education Quality > Structural Quality

Child Care & Early Education Providers/Organizations > Provider Type/Setting > Family Child Care & Early Education

Child Care & Early Education Provider Workforce
Country: United States
ISSN: 1573-3319 Online
1053-1890 Paper
Peer Reviewed: yes
hide record ↑


More Like This

what is this? These resources were found by comparing the title, description, and topics of the currently selected resource to the rest of the Research Connections holdings.

What does national accreditation mean for child care? Fact Sheets & Briefs
Working in child care in Indiana: 2005 Indiana child care workforce study Reports & Papers
New Jersey's family child care providers: Summary of 2011 survey results: Comparison of 2005 and 2011 data Reports & Papers
The quality of work life in NAEYC accredited and nonaccredited early childhood programs Reports & Papers
Georgia study of early care and education: Family child care findings Reports & Papers

Disclaimer: Use of the above resource is governed by Research Connections' Terms of Use.

Research Connections is supported by grant #90YE0104 from the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The contents are solely the responsibility of the National Center for Children in Poverty and the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, the Administration for Children and Families, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Google Translate